Literature DB >> 17683242

Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features.

Valérie Goffaux1, Bruno Rossion.   

Abstract

Upside-down inversion disrupts the processing of spatial relations between the features of a face, while largely preserving local feature analysis. However, recent studies on face inversion failed to observe a clear dissociation between relational and featural processing. To resolve these discrepancies and clarify how inversion affects face perception, the authors monitored inversion effects separately for vertical and horizontal distances between features. Inversion dramatically declined performance in the vertical-relational condition, but it impaired featural and horizontal-relational performance only moderately. Identical observations were made whether upright and inverted trials were blocked or randomly interleaved. The largest performance decrement was found for vertical relations even when faces were rotated by 90 degrees. Evidence that inversion dramatically disrupts the ability to extract vertical but not horizontal feature relations supports the view that inversion qualitatively changes face perception by rendering some of the processes activated by upright faces largely ineffective. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17683242     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.995

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  28 in total

1.  A feature-inversion effect: can an isolated feature show behavior like the face-inversion effect?

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

Review 3.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Environmental inversion effects in face perception.

Authors:  Nicolas Davidenko; Stephen J Flusberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-03-14

5.  Explaining the face-inversion effect: the face-scheme incompatibility (FSI) model.

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

6.  Seeing faces as objects: no face inversion effect with geometrical discrimination.

Authors:  Pamela M Pallett; Donald I A MacLeod
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Task effects, performance levels, features, configurations, and holistic face processing: a reply to Rossion.

Authors:  Maximilian Riesenhuber; Brian S Wolff
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-08-07

8.  Face and object discrimination in autism, and relationship to IQ and age.

Authors:  Pamela M Pallett; Shereen J Cohen; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-05

9.  The effects of information type (features vs. configuration) and location (eyes vs. mouth) on the development of face perception.

Authors:  James W Tanaka; Paul C Quinn; Buyun Xu; Kim Maynard; Natalie Huxtable; Kang Lee; Olivier Pascalis
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2014-04-18

10.  The part task of the part-spacing paradigm is not a pure measurement of part-based information of faces.

Authors:  Qi Zhu; Xiaobai Li; Kari Chow; Jia Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.