Literature DB >> 22425642

Environmental inversion effects in face perception.

Nicolas Davidenko1, Stephen J Flusberg.   

Abstract

Visual processing is highly sensitive to stimulus orientation; for example, face perception is drastically worse when faces are oriented inverted vs. upright. However, stimulus orientation must be established in relation to a particular reference frame, and in most studies, several reference frames are conflated. Which reference frame(s) matter in the perception of faces? Here we describe a simple, novel method for dissociating effects of egocentric and environmental orientation on face processing. Participants performed one of two face-processing tasks (expression classification and recognition memory) as they lay horizontally, which served to disassociate the egocentric and environmental frames. We found large effects of egocentric orientation on performance and smaller but reliable effects of environmental orientation. In a follow-up control experiment, we ruled out the possibility that the latter could be explained by compensatory ocular counterroll. We argue that environmental orientation influences face processing, which is revealed when egocentric orientation is fixed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425642      PMCID: PMC3341991          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  23 in total

1.  Reference frames for orientation anisotropies in face recognition and biological-motion perception.

Authors:  Nikolaus F Troje
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  A new closure test.

Authors:  C M MOONEY; G A FERGUSON
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1951-09

3.  Analyzing head roll and eye torsion by means of offline image processing.

Authors:  Frédéric Sarès; Lionel Granjon; Abdelrhani Benraiss; Philippe Boulinguez
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

4.  Silhouetted face profiles: a new methodology for face perception research.

Authors:  Nicolas Davidenko
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Spatial memories of virtual environments: how egocentric experience, intrinsic structure, and extrinsic structure interact.

Authors:  Jonathan W Kelly; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Mental rotation of faces.

Authors:  T Valentine; V Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-11

8.  Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion.

Authors:  P Thompson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Task effects, performance levels, features, configurations, and holistic face processing: a reply to Rossion.

Authors:  Maximilian Riesenhuber; Brian S Wolff
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2009-08-07

10.  Gravity and observer's body orientation influence the visual perception of human body postures.

Authors:  Christophe Lopez; Christelle Bachofner; Manuel Mercier; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  How are bodies special? Effects of body features on spatial reasoning.

Authors:  Alfred B Yu; Jeffrey M Zacks
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.143

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.