Literature DB >> 20946552

Fragmented QRS complex has poor sensitivity in detecting myocardial scar.

Dee Dee Wang1, Daniel M Buerkel, James R Corbett, Hitinder S Gurm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the association of the fragmented QRS complex versus the Q wave with myocardial scar and viability.
BACKGROUND: A prior study has suggested that the fragmented QRS complex on an electrocardiogram (ECG) is a highly sensitive and specific marker of myocardial scar as detected by regional perfusion abnormalities on a nuclear stress test. There is no external validation of this data.
METHODS: We correlated the ECG and nuclear perfusion images of 460 consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. The presence of fragmented QRS or Q waves in two contiguous ECG leads was correlated with major coronary artery distributions on nuclear perfusion imaging.
RESULTS: For the 1842 evaluated territories, the fragmented QRS complex was not superior to the Q wave in detecting fixed or mixed myocardial defects. The fragmented QRS complex was associated with worse sensitivity (1.7%) in comparison to the Q wave (31.7%) for identifying myocardial scar. The fragmented QRS complex carried a higher false positive rate in patients with normal perfusion scans (15.8%, 221 segments), in comparison to Q waves (1.4%, 17 segments).
CONCLUSION: In our study population, both the fragmented QRS and Q wave had poor sensitivity and specificity in detecting fixed or mixed myocardial scar. Larger studies are needed to evaluate fragmented QRS as a surrogate of myocardial scar before it can be incorporated into clinical practice. ©2010, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20946552      PMCID: PMC6931930          DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2010.00385.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  9 in total

1.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines).

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons; Gary J Balady; J Timothy Bricker; Bernard R Chaitman; Gerald F Fletcher; Victor F Froelicher; Daniel B Mark; Ben D McCallister; Aryan N Mooss; Michael G O'Reilly; William L Winters; Raymond J Gibbons; Elliott M Antman; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Richard O Russell; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Significance of a fragmented QRS complex versus a Q wave in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Mithilesh K Das; Bilal Khan; Sony Jacob; Awaneesh Kumar; Jo Mahenthiran
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Edward P Ficaro; Benjamin C Lee; James N Kritzman; James R Corbett
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Electrocardiographic signs of remote myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mark A Michael; Hicham El Masry; Bilal R Khan; Mithilesh K Das
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.194

5.  Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J S Alpert; K Thygesen; E Antman; J P Bassand
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  [The electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction with reperfusion: current concepts regarding Q waves and their dynamics].

Authors:  J Sochman
Journal:  Vnitr Lek       Date:  2006-12

Review 7.  Q-wave versus non-Q wave myocardial infarction: a meaningless distinction.

Authors:  B Phibbs; F Marcus; H J Marriott; A Moss; D H Spodick
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Simultaneous transmission/emission myocardial perfusion tomography. Diagnostic accuracy of attenuation-corrected 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  E P Ficaro; J A Fessler; P D Shreve; J N Kritzman; P A Rose; J R Corbett
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Q-wave prediction of myocardial infarct location, size and transmural extent at magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Daniele Rovai; Gianluca Di Bella; Giuseppe Rossi; Massimo Lombardi; Giovanni D Aquaro; Antonio L'Abbate; Alessandro Pingitore
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.439

  9 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  The role of fQRS in coronary artery disease. A meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Y Xu; Z Qiu; Y Xu; H Bao; S Gao; X Cheng
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes.

Authors:  Dee Dee Wang; Amit Tibrewala; Phuc Nguygen; Tanmay Swadia; Gordon Jacobsen; Arfaat Khan; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-08

3.  [Fragmented QRS. Relevance in clinical practice].

Authors:  Alexander Steger; Daniel Sinnecker; Anna Berkefeld; Alexander Müller; Josef Gebhardt; Michael Dommasch; Katharina M Huster; Petra Barthel; Georg Schmidt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-09

4.  Short-term Prognosis of Fragmented QRS Complex in Patients with Non-ST Elevated Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Min Li; Xiao Wang; Shu-Hua Mi; Zhe Chi; Qing Chen; Xin Zhao; Shao-Ping Nie
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 5.  QRS fragmentation: its role in sherlocking the arrhythmogenic heart.

Authors:  Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk; Salman Farooq; Ali Raza Ghani; Shilpkakumar Arora
Journal:  J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect       Date:  2016-07-06

6.  QRS Fragmentation Patterns Representing Myocardial Scar Need to Be Separated from Benign Normal Variants: Hypotheses and Proposal for Morphology based Classification.

Authors:  M Anette E Haukilahti; Antti Eranti; Tuomas Kenttä; Heikki V Huikuri
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Fragmented QRS and abnormal creatine kinase-MB are predictors of coronary artery disease in patients with angina and normal electrocardiographys.

Authors:  Jung Joo Lee; Jae Hoon Lee; Jin Woo Jeong; Jun Young Chung
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.884

8.  Myocardial viability: what we knew and what is new.

Authors:  Adel Shabana; Ayman El-Menyar
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 1.866

9.  Fragmented QRS: What Is The Meaning?

Authors:  Yutaka Take; Hiroshi Morita
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2012-09-01

10.  The relationship between fragmentation on electrocardiography and in-hospital prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ersin Yıldırım; Denizhan Karaçimen; Kazım Serhan Ozcan; Damirbek Osmonov; Ceyhan Türkkan; Servet Altay; Ufuk Sadık Ceylan; Murat Uğur; Mehmet Bozbay; Izzet Erdinler
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.