Literature DB >> 3484414

Measurement of normal left heart dimensions using optimally oriented MR images.

S Kaul, G L Wismer, T J Brady, D L Johnston, A E Weyman, R D Okada, R E Dinsmore.   

Abstract

In order to establish normal values for left heart dimensions by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electrocardiographically gated MRI was performed in 16 normal asymptomatic subjects using a whole-body 0.6-T superconducting magnet with a spin-echo pulse sequence and an echo delay (TE) of 30 msec. Images were oriented along the long and short axes of the left ventricle in planes similar to two-dimensional echocardiograms (2DE). Comparable 2DE images were obtained for validation of the MRI measurements. The following measurements of the left heart were made at end diastole and end systole in both long- and short-axis views using both techniques: left ventricular cavity diameters, interventricular septum and posterior wall thicknesses at chordal and mid-papillary-muscle levels, and anteroposterior mid-left-atrial diameter. There was good correlation between the two techniques in a total of 141 measurements (MRI = 0.94 2DE + 1.42, p less than 0.0001, r = 0.97) and in the individual measurements considered separately (p less than 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean values. MRI measurements obtained with the image planes oriented to the intrinsic axes of the heart are similar to those obtained by 2DE. These data provide normal values for measurements of the left heart using a standardized MRI technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3484414     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.146.1.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  10 in total

1.  Comparison between ECTb and QGS for assessment of left ventricular function from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Kenneth Nichols; Cesar A Santana; Russell Folks; Elizabeth Krawczynska; C David Cooke; Tracy L Faber; Steven R Bergmann; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Imaging of ventricular function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Vikas K Rathi; Robert W W Biederman
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging vs. ultrafast computed tomography for cardiac diagnosis.

Authors:  R M MacMillan
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

4.  Corridor4DM: the Michigan method for quantitative nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Edward P Ficaro; Benjamin C Lee; James N Kritzman; James R Corbett
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Quantitation of cardiac dimensions from ECG-synchronized MRI studies.

Authors:  R E Dinsmore
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  Quantification of cardiac function by conventional and cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  U Sechtem; P Pflugfelder; C B Higgins
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging planes for the 3-dimensional characterisation of human coronary arteries.

Authors:  A R Gates; C L Huang; J J Crowley; A Gresham; L M Shapiro; T A Carpenter; L D Hall
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Motion frozen (18)F-FDG cardiac PET.

Authors:  Ludovic Le Meunier; Piotr J Slomka; Damini Dey; Amit Ramesh; Louis E J Thomson; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Victor Cheng; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Clinical impact of arrhythmias on gated SPECT cardiac myocardial perfusion and function assessment.

Authors:  K Nichols; S S Yao; M Kamran; T L Faber; C D Cooke; E G DePuey
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Electrical wave propagation in an anisotropic model of the left ventricle based on analytical description of cardiac architecture.

Authors:  Sergey F Pravdin; Hans Dierckx; Leonid B Katsnelson; Olga Solovyova; Vladimir S Markhasin; Alexander V Panfilov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.