Klea D Bertakis1, Rahman Azari. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, USA. kdbertakis@ucdavis.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient and physician gender may impact the process of medical care and its outcomes. Our objective was to investigate the influence of patient gender on what takes place during initial primary care visits while controlling for other variables previously demonstrated to affect the physician-patient interaction, such as physician gender and specialty, patient health status, pain, depression, obesity, age, education, and income. METHODS:New patients (315 women, 194 men) were randomized for care by 105 primary care physicians. Sociodemographic information, self-reported health status and pain measures, a depression evaluation, screening for alcoholism, history of tobacco use, and measured body mass index (BMI) were collected during a previsit interview. The entire medical visit was videotaped, and then analyzed using the Davis Observation Code (DOC) system. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the visit length or work intensity (number of behavioral codes) for female patients compared with male patients; however, women's visits had more discussions regarding the results of the therapeutic interventions, more preventive services, less physical examination, and fewer discussions about tobacco, alcohol, and other substance abuse. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the process of care between female and male patients. Physicians may be making medical decisions based on gender-related considerations. Strategies for implementing knowledge about these gender differences are crucial for the delivery of gender-sensitive care.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patient and physician gender may impact the process of medical care and its outcomes. Our objective was to investigate the influence of patient gender on what takes place during initial primary care visits while controlling for other variables previously demonstrated to affect the physician-patient interaction, such as physician gender and specialty, patient health status, pain, depression, obesity, age, education, and income. METHODS: New patients (315 women, 194 men) were randomized for care by 105 primary care physicians. Sociodemographic information, self-reported health status and pain measures, a depression evaluation, screening for alcoholism, history of tobacco use, and measured body mass index (BMI) were collected during a previsit interview. The entire medical visit was videotaped, and then analyzed using the Davis Observation Code (DOC) system. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the visit length or work intensity (number of behavioral codes) for female patients compared with male patients; however, women's visits had more discussions regarding the results of the therapeutic interventions, more preventive services, less physical examination, and fewer discussions about tobacco, alcohol, and other substance abuse. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in the process of care between female and male patients. Physicians may be making medical decisions based on gender-related considerations. Strategies for implementing knowledge about these gender differences are crucial for the delivery of gender-sensitive care.
Authors: Oni J Blackstock; Mary Catherine Beach; P Todd Korthuis; Jonathan A Cohn; Victoria L Sharp; Richard D Moore; Somnath Saha Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: Gail L Rose; Sarah E Guth; Gary J Badger; Dennis A Plante; Tera L Fazzino; John E Helzer Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Hava Tabenkin; Charles B Eaton; Mary B Roberts; Donna R Parker; Jerome H McMurray; Jeffrey Borkan Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Steven D Vannoy; Tonya Fancher; Caitlyn Meltvedt; Jürgen Unützer; Paul Duberstein; Richard L Kravitz Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Kevin C Cain; Monica E Jarrett; Robert L Burr; Sheldon Rosen; Vicky L Hertig; Margaret M Heitkemper Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Desirée Loikas; Linnéa Karlsson; Mia von Euler; Karin Hallgren; Karin Schenck-Gustafsson; Pia Bastholm Rahmner Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 2.497