Klea D Bertakis1, Rahman Azari. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, USA. kdbertakis@ucdavis.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Patient-centered care (PCC) is thought to significantly influence the process of care and its outcomes and has been identified as part of a comprehensive strategy for improving our nation's healthcare delivery system. Patient and physician gender, as well as gender concordance, may influence the provision of PCC. METHODS:Patients (315 women, 194 men) were randomized to care by primary care resident physicians (48 women, 57 men). Sociodemographic information, history of health risk behaviors (tobacco use, alcoholism, and obesity), and self-reported global pain and health status were collected before the first visit. That visit and subsequent patient visits to the primary care physician (PCP) were videotaped during the year-long study period. PCC was measured by coding all videotapes using a modified version of the Davis Observation Code. RESULTS: No significant gender differences in PCC were found between the male and female patients; however, female physicians provided increased PCC to their patients. The greatest amount of PCC was seen in the female patient-female physician gender dyad. Regression analyses, controlling for other patient variables, confirmed that female concordant dyads were associated with a greater amount of PCC. There was no significant relationship for the male patient-male physician concordance (vs. disconcordance). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the influence of gender in the process of care and provision of PCC. Gender concordance in female patient-female physician dyads demonstrated significantly more PCC. Further research in other clinical settings using other measures of PCC is needed. A public mandate to provide care that is patient-centered has implications for medical education.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Patient-centered care (PCC) is thought to significantly influence the process of care and its outcomes and has been identified as part of a comprehensive strategy for improving our nation's healthcare delivery system. Patient and physician gender, as well as gender concordance, may influence the provision of PCC. METHODS:Patients (315 women, 194 men) were randomized to care by primary care resident physicians (48 women, 57 men). Sociodemographic information, history of health risk behaviors (tobacco use, alcoholism, and obesity), and self-reported global pain and health status were collected before the first visit. That visit and subsequent patient visits to the primary care physician (PCP) were videotaped during the year-long study period. PCC was measured by coding all videotapes using a modified version of the Davis Observation Code. RESULTS: No significant gender differences in PCC were found between the male and female patients; however, female physicians provided increased PCC to their patients. The greatest amount of PCC was seen in the female patient-female physician gender dyad. Regression analyses, controlling for other patient variables, confirmed that female concordant dyads were associated with a greater amount of PCC. There was no significant relationship for the male patient-male physician concordance (vs. disconcordance). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the influence of gender in the process of care and provision of PCC. Gender concordance in female patient-female physician dyads demonstrated significantly more PCC. Further research in other clinical settings using other measures of PCC is needed. A public mandate to provide care that is patient-centered has implications for medical education.
Authors: Hava Tabenkin; Meredith A Goodwin; Stephen J Zyzanski; Kurt C Stange; Jack H Medalie Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Alexis K Barrett; John P Cashy; Carolyn T Thorpe; Jennifer A Hale; Kangho Suh; Bruce L Lambert; William Galanter; Jeffrey A Linder; Gordon D Schiff; Walid F Gellad Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: M Gentry Byrd; Rocio B Quinonez; R Gary Rozier; Ceib Phillips; Marian Mehegan; Ledia Martinez; Kimon Divaris Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2018-07
Authors: Teresa L Hagan; Susan M Cohen; Margaret Q Rosenzweig; Kristin Zorn; Clement A Stone; Heidi S Donovan Journal: J Adv Nurs Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 3.187
Authors: Kerry Woolfall; Valerie Shilling; Helen Hickey; Rosalind L Smyth; Emma Sowden; Paula R Williamson; Bridget Young Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 3.240