Literature DB >> 20065276

Suicide inquiry in primary care: creating context, inquiring, and following up.

Steven D Vannoy1, Tonya Fancher, Caitlyn Meltvedt, Jürgen Unützer, Paul Duberstein, Richard L Kravitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We wanted to describe the vocabulary and narrative context of primary care physicians' inquiries about suicide.
METHODS: One hundred fifty-two primary care physicians (53% to 61% of those approached) were randomly recruited from 4 sites in Northern California and Rochester, New York, to participate in a study assessing the effect of a patient's request for antidepressant medication on a physician's prescribing behavior. Standardized patients portraying 2 conditions (carpal tunnel syndrome and major depression, or back pain and adjustment disorder with depressed mood) and 3 antidepressant request types (brand-specific, general, or none) made 298 unannounced visits to these physicians between May 2003 and May 2004. Standardized patients were instructed to deny suicidality if the physician asked. We identified the subset of transcripts that contained a distinct suicide inquiry (n = 91) for inductive analysis and review. Our qualitative analysis focused on elucidating the narrative context in which inquiries are made, how physicians construct their inquiries, and how they respond to a patient's denial of suicidality.
RESULTS: Most suicide inquiries used clear terminology related to self-harm, suicide, or killing oneself. Three types of inquiry were identified: (1) straightforward (eg, "Are you feeling like hurting yourself?"); (2) supportive framing (eg, "Sometimes depression gets so bad that people feel that life is no longer worth living. Have you felt this way?"); and (3) no problem preferred (eg, "You're not feeling suicidal, are you?"). Four inquiries were glaringly awkward, potentially inhibiting a patient's disclosure. Most (79%) suicide inquiries were preceded by statements focusing on psychosocial concerns, and most (86%) physician responses to a standardized patient's denial of ideation were followed up with relevant statements (eg, "I hope you would tell me if you did.").
CONCLUSION: Although most suicide inquiries by primary care physicians are sensitive, clear, and supportive, some language is used that may inhibit suicide disclosure. Some physician responses may unintentionally reinforce patients for remaining silent about their risk. This study will inform future research in the development of quality improvement interventions to support primary care physicians in making clear, appropriate, and sensitive inquires about suicide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20065276      PMCID: PMC2807385          DOI: 10.1370/afm.1036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  23 in total

Review 1.  Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review.

Authors:  J John Mann; Alan Apter; Jose Bertolote; Annette Beautrais; Dianne Currier; Ann Haas; Ulrich Hegerl; Jouko Lonnqvist; Kevin Malone; Andrej Marusic; Lars Mehlum; George Patton; Michael Phillips; Wolfgang Rutz; Zoltan Rihmer; Armin Schmidtke; David Shaffer; Morton Silverman; Yoshitomo Takahashi; Airi Varnik; Danuta Wasserman; Paul Yip; Herbert Hendin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Patient gender and communication with physicians: results of a community-based study.

Authors:  J A Hall; D L Roter
Journal:  Womens Health       Date:  1995

Review 3.  Suicide over 60: the San Diego study.

Authors:  S S Carney; C L Rich; P A Burke; R C Fowler
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Comparison of primary care resident physicians' practice styles during initial and return patient visits.

Authors:  K D Bertakis; R Azari; E J Callahan; J A Robbins; L J Helms
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Relationships of age and axis I diagnoses in victims of completed suicide: a psychological autopsy study.

Authors:  Y Conwell; P R Duberstein; C Cox; J H Herrmann; N T Forbes; E D Caine
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  The acceptability of treatment for depression among African-American, Hispanic, and white primary care patients.

Authors:  Lisa A Cooper; Junius J Gonzales; Joseph J Gallo; Kathryn M Rost; Lisa S Meredith; Lisa V Rubenstein; Nae-Yuh Wang; Daniel E Ford
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  A qualitative analysis of how physicians with expertise in domestic violence approach the identification of victims.

Authors:  B Gerbert; N Caspers; A Bronstone; J Moe; P Abercrombie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-10-19       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Influence of patients' requests for direct-to-consumer advertised antidepressants: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard L Kravitz; Ronald M Epstein; Mitchell D Feldman; Carol E Franz; Rahman Azari; Michael S Wilkes; Ladson Hinton; Peter Franks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Suicide and recency of health care contacts. A systematic review.

Authors:  J Pirkis; P Burgess
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.319

10.  Physician gender, patient gender, and primary care.

Authors:  Peter Franks; Klea D Bertakis
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.681

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Addressing suicidality in primary care settings.

Authors:  J Michael Bostwick; Sandra Rackley
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Suicide risk and associated demographic and clinical correlates among primary care patients with recent drug use.

Authors:  Adam Carmel; Richard Ries; Imara I West; Kristin Bumgardner; Peter Roy-Byrne
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.829

3.  In this issue:race, place, and sex matter.

Authors:  John J Frey
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 4.  National pathways for suicide prevention and health services research.

Authors:  Brian K Ahmedani; Steven Vannoy
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Recognizing and Reacting to Risk Signs for Patient Suicide.

Authors:  Lori Zitelli; Catherine V Palmer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-02-07

Review 6.  The advantages and challenges of unannounced standardized patient methodology to assess healthcare communication.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Heather L Rogers; Allison C Waller; Sonja Harris-Haywood; Ronald M Esptein; Francesc Borrell Carrio; Gayle Gliva-McConvey; Daniel R Longo
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-03

7.  The effect of targeted and tailored patient depression engagement interventions on patient-physician discussion of suicidal thoughts: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Ruby Shah; Peter Franks; Anthony Jerant; Mitchell Feldman; Paul Duberstein; Erik Fernandez y Garcia; Ladson Hinton; Lorrie Strohecker; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Now what should I do? Primary care physicians' responses to older adults expressing thoughts of suicide.

Authors:  Steven D Vannoy; Ming Tai-Seale; Paul Duberstein; Laura J Eaton; Mary Ann Cook
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Suicide Risk Assessments: Which Suicide Risk Factors Psychiatric Residents Consider Significant?

Authors:  Sheng-Min Wang; Sunyoung Hwang; Bora Yeon; Kyoung Ho Choi; Youngmin Oh; Hae-Kook Lee; Yong-Sil Kweon; Chung Tai Lee; Kyoung-Uk Lee
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 2.505

10.  Stakeholder views regarding a planned primary care office-based interactive multimedia suicide prevention tool.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Paul Duberstein; Camille Cipri; Bethany Bullard; Deborah Stone; Debora Paterniti
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.