Literature DB >> 17668311

Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: a review.

Heather A Rupp1, Kim Wallen.   

Abstract

This article reviews what is currently known about how men and women respond to the presentation of visual sexual stimuli. While the assumption that men respond more to visual sexual stimuli is generally empirically supported, previous reports of sex differences are confounded by the variable content of the stimuli presented and measurement techniques. We propose that the cognitive processing stage of responding to sexual stimuli is the first stage in which sex differences occur. The divergence between men and women is proposed to occur at this time, reflected in differences in neural activation, and contribute to previously reported sex differences in downstream peripheral physiological responses and subjective reports of sexual arousal. Additionally, this review discusses factors that may contribute to the variability in sex differences observed in response to visual sexual stimuli. Factors include participant variables, such as hormonal state and socialized sexual attitudes, as well as variables specific to the content presented in the stimuli. Based on the literature reviewed, we conclude that content characteristics may differentially produce higher levels of sexual arousal in men and women. Specifically, men appear more influenced by the sex of the actors depicted in the stimuli while women's response may differ with the context presented. Sexual motivation, perceived gender role expectations, and sexual attitudes are possible influences. These differences are of practical importance to future research on sexual arousal that aims to use experimental stimuli comparably appealing to men and women and also for general understanding of cognitive sex differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17668311      PMCID: PMC2739403          DOI: 10.1007/s10508-007-9217-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  58 in total

1.  Gender differences in response to pictures of nudes: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Marco Costa; Christoph Braun; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Contingent negative variation as an indicator of sexual object preference.

Authors:  R M Costell; D T Lunde; B S Kopell; W K Wittner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-08-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Areas of brain activation in males and females during viewing of erotic film excerpts.

Authors:  Sherif Karama; André Roch Lecours; Jean-Maxime Leroux; Pierre Bourgouin; Gilles Beaudoin; Sven Joubert; Mario Beauregard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; Gerulf Rieger; Elizabeth Latty; J Michael Bailey
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-11

5.  Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Stephan Hamann; Rebecca A Herman; Carla L Nolan; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-07       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  What can animal models tell us about human sexual response?

Authors:  James G Pfaus; Tod E Kippin; Genaro Coria-Avila
Journal:  Annu Rev Sex Res       Date:  2003

7.  Women's preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Steven W Gangestad; Jeffry A Simpson; Alita J Cousins; Christine E Garver-Apgar; P Niels Christensen
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-03

8.  Truth and consequences: using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality.

Authors:  Michele G Alexander; Terri D Fisher
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2003-02

Review 9.  Sexual double standards: a review and methodological critique of two decades of research.

Authors:  Mary Crawford; Danielle Popp
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2003-02

10.  Selecting films for sex research: gender differences in erotic film preference.

Authors:  Erick Janssen; Deanna Carpenter; Cynthia A Graham
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2003-06
View more
  50 in total

1.  Sexuality and physical contact in National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project Wave 2.

Authors:  Adena M Galinsky; Martha K McClintock; Linda J Waite
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Sexual touching and difficulties with sexual arousal and orgasm among U.S. older adults.

Authors:  Adena M Galinsky
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2011-12-08

Review 3.  Sex, drugs, and rock 'n' roll: hypothesizing common mesolimbic activation as a function of reward gene polymorphisms.

Authors:  Kenneth Blum; Tonia Werner; Stefanie Carnes; Patrick Carnes; Abdalla Bowirrat; John Giordano; Marlene Oscar-Berman; Mark Gold
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar

4.  Abnormal medial prefrontal cortex activity in heavy cannabis users during conscious emotional evaluation.

Authors:  Michael J Wesley; Joshua A Lile; Colleen A Hanlon; Linda J Porrino
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Selective looking at natural scenes: Hedonic content and gender.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley; Vincent D Costa; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Moderated Mediation of Perceived Intoxication and Sexual Arousal on Determinants of Sexual Risk Behavior in Men Who Have Sex with Men.

Authors:  Katherine A Buckheit; Luke D Mitzel; Stephen A Maisto; Tibor Palfai; Peter Vanable
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2019-06

7.  Sex differences in interactions between nucleus accumbens and visual cortex by explicit visual erotic stimuli: an fMRI study.

Authors:  S W Lee; B S Jeong; J Choi; J-W Kim
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.896

8.  Smaller volume and altered functional connectivity of the amygdala in patients with lifelong premature ejaculation.

Authors:  Bowen Geng; Ming Gao; Jiayu Wu; Guang Yang; Chengxiang Liu; Ruiqing Piao; Shuming Zhang; Ke Xu; Jianlin Yuan; Peng Liu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Neuroticism and Attention Toward Sexual and Non-Sexual Images During an Oddball Task: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Mariana L Carrito; Joana Carvalho; Ana Pereira; Pedro Bem-Haja; Pedro Nobre; Isabel M Santos
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-07-19

10.  Sex-specific content preferences for visual sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Heather A Rupp; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-08-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.