Literature DB >> 12738404

Gender differences in response to pictures of nudes: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Marco Costa1, Christoph Braun, Niels Birbaumer.   

Abstract

The magnetic equivalent of the contingent negative variation (CMV) and visual evoked magnetic fields (VEF) in anticipation of pictures of opposite-sex nude, same-sex nude, and neutral photographs has been recorded with whole-head MEG in 12 males and 12 females. Subjective ratings of valence indicated a strong gender effect. While females rated both male and female nudes as neutral, males rated male nudes similar to neutrals but female nudes received higher scores of pleasantness. Gender differences were also found for ratings of picture-induced arousal. While females rated male and female nudes as equally arousing, males attributed more arousal to opposite-sex nudes. The CMV instead revealed, for both male and female participants, higher amplitudes for opposite-sex nudes. VEF in response to nudes revealed two components with mean latencies of 126 and 203 ms. The amplitude of the first component was stronger in males than in females, and only in males the magnetic activity was increased in response to male and female nudes compared to neutral pictures. For the second component the mean magnetic activity was higher in response to nudes than to neutral contents for both male and female participants. The results are discussed in terms of an evolutionary view of sexual selection, which predicts a greater response in male subjects to stimuli relevant for mate choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12738404     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(03)00054-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  9 in total

1.  Anticipation of affective image modulates visual evoked magnetic fields (VEF).

Authors:  Keiichi Onoda; Yasumasa Okamoto; Kazuhiro Shishida; Akira Hashizume; Kazutaka Ueda; Akiko Kinoshita; Hidehisa Yamashita; Shigeto Yamawaki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Rapid discrimination of visual scene content in the human brain.

Authors:  Andrey P Anokhin; Simon Golosheykin; Erik Sirevaag; Sean Kristjansson; John W Rohrbaugh; Andrew C Heath
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  The voices of seduction: cross-gender effects in processing of erotic prosody.

Authors:  Thomas Ethofer; Sarah Wiethoff; Silke Anders; Benjamin Kreifelts; Wolfgang Grodd; Dirk Wildgruber
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Heather A Rupp; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2007-08-01

5.  Sex-specific content preferences for visual sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Heather A Rupp; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-08-22

6.  The naked truth: the face and body sensitive N170 response is enhanced for nude bodies.

Authors:  Jari K Hietanen; Lauri Nummenmaa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Sex Differences in Emotional Evaluation of Film Clips: Interaction with Five High Arousal Emotional Categories.

Authors:  Antonio Maffei; Valentina Vencato; Alessandro Angrilli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Straight but Not Narrow; Within-Gender Variation in the Gender-Specificity of Women's Sexual Response.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers; Katrina N Bouchard; Amanda D Timmers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Selecting pure-emotion materials from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) by Chinese university students: A study based on intensity-ratings only.

Authors:  Zhicha Xu; Rongsheng Zhu; Chanchan Shen; Bingren Zhang; Qianqian Gao; You Xu; Wei Wang
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2017-08-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.