Michael J Wesley1, Joshua A Lile2, Colleen A Hanlon3, Linda J Porrino4. 1. Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY, USA. michael.wesley@uky.edu. 2. Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. 4. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Long-term heavy cannabis users (cannabis users) who are not acutely intoxicated have diminished subconscious neural responsiveness to affective stimuli. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine if abnormal processing extends to the conscious evaluation of emotional stimuli. METHODS: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine brain activity as cannabis users (N = 16) and non-cannabis-using controls (N = 17) evaluated and categorized standardized International Affective Picture System (IAPS) stimuli. Individual judgments were used to isolate activity during the evaluation of emotional (i.e., emotional evaluation) or neutral (i.e., neutral evaluation) stimuli. Within- and between-group analyses were performed. RESULTS: Both groups judged the same stimuli as emotional and had activations in visual, midbrain, and middle cingulate cortices during emotional evaluation, relative to neutral. Within-group analyses also revealed amygdalar and inferior frontal gyrus activations in controls, but not cannabis users, and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) deactivations in cannabis users, but not controls, during emotional evaluation, relative to neutral. Between-group comparisons found that mPFC activity during positive and negative evaluation was significantly hypoactive in cannabis users, relative to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal neural processing of affective content extends to the level of consciousness in cannabis users. The hypoactive mPFC responses observed resembles the attenuated mPFC responses found during increased non-affective cognitive load in prior research. These findings suggest that abnormal mPFC singling in cannabis users during emotional evaluation might be associated with increased non-affective cognitive load.
RATIONALE: Long-term heavy cannabis users (cannabis users) who are not acutely intoxicated have diminished subconscious neural responsiveness to affective stimuli. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine if abnormal processing extends to the conscious evaluation of emotional stimuli. METHODS: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to examine brain activity as cannabis users (N = 16) and non-cannabis-using controls (N = 17) evaluated and categorized standardized International Affective Picture System (IAPS) stimuli. Individual judgments were used to isolate activity during the evaluation of emotional (i.e., emotional evaluation) or neutral (i.e., neutral evaluation) stimuli. Within- and between-group analyses were performed. RESULTS: Both groups judged the same stimuli as emotional and had activations in visual, midbrain, and middle cingulate cortices during emotional evaluation, relative to neutral. Within-group analyses also revealed amygdalar and inferior frontal gyrus activations in controls, but not cannabis users, and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) deactivations in cannabis users, but not controls, during emotional evaluation, relative to neutral. Between-group comparisons found that mPFC activity during positive and negative evaluation was significantly hypoactive in cannabis users, relative to controls. CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal neural processing of affective content extends to the level of consciousness in cannabis users. The hypoactive mPFC responses observed resembles the attenuated mPFC responses found during increased non-affective cognitive load in prior research. These findings suggest that abnormal mPFC singling in cannabis users during emotional evaluation might be associated with increased non-affective cognitive load.
Authors: Ahmad R Hariri; Venkata S Mattay; Alessandro Tessitore; Francesco Fera; Daniel R Weinberger Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: C Anderson Johnson; Lin Xiao; Paula Palmer; Ping Sun; Qiong Wang; Yonglan Wei; Yong Jia; Jerry L Grenard; Alan W Stacy; Antoine Bechara Journal: Neuropsychologia Date: 2007-09-29 Impact factor: 3.139
Authors: Christopher D Chambers; Mark A Bellgrove; Mark G Stokes; Tracy R Henderson; Hugh Garavan; Ian H Robertson; Adam P Morris; Jason B Mattingley Journal: J Cogn Neurosci Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Kristin E Maple; Alicia M Thomas; Megan M Kangiser; Krista M Lisdahl Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2019-04-30 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Kaeli Zimmermann; Christina Walz; Raissa T Derckx; Keith M Kendrick; Bernd Weber; Bruce Dore; Kevin N Ochsner; René Hurlemann; Benjamin Becker Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Julio A Yanes; Michael C Riedel; Kimberly L Ray; Anna E Kirkland; Ryan T Bird; Emily R Boeving; Meredith A Reid; Raul Gonzalez; Jennifer L Robinson; Angela R Laird; Matthew T Sutherland Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Joseph Aloi; Karina S Blair; Harma Meffert; Stuart F White; Soonjo Hwang; Patrick M Tyler; Kathleen I Crum; Laura C Thornton; Alita Mobley; Abraham D Killanin; Francesca M Filbey; Kayla Pope; R James Blair Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 4.280