Literature DB >> 12807296

Selecting films for sex research: gender differences in erotic film preference.

Erick Janssen1, Deanna Carpenter, Cynthia A Graham.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore gender differences in sexual responsiveness to erotic films that had been selected for their differential appeal for men and women. A secondary objective was to identify variables that influence sexual arousal and explore whether these variables differ for men and women. Fifteen men (M age = 26 yrs) and 17 women (M age = 24 yrs) were presented with 20 film clips depicting heterosexual interactions, half of which were female- and the other half male-selected, and were asked to rate the clips on a number of dimensions. Overall, men found the film clips more sexually arousing than did the women. Gender differences in arousal were negligible for female-selected clips but substantial for male-selected clips. Furthermore, men and women experienced higher levels of sexual arousal to clips selected for individuals of their own gender. Cluster regression analyses, explaining 77% of the variance for male and 65% for female participants, revealed that men's sexual arousal was dependent upon the attractiveness of the female actor, feeling interested, and both "imagining oneself as a participant" and "watching as an observer." For women, with all variables entered, only "imagining oneself as a participant" contributed to sexual arousal ratings. The findings suggest that how films are selected in sex research is an important variable in predicting levels of sexual arousal reported by men and women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12807296     DOI: 10.1023/a:1023413617648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  18 in total

1.  Selective looking at natural scenes: Hedonic content and gender.

Authors:  Margaret M Bradley; Vincent D Costa; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-07-05       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  The effects of impulsivity, sexual arousability, and abstract intellectual ability on men's and women's go/no-go task performance.

Authors:  Kathryn R Macapagal; Erick Janssen; Daniel J Fridberg; Peter R Finn; Julia R Heiman
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2010-09-23

3.  Affect and Sexual Responsivity in Men With and Without a History of Sexual Aggression.

Authors:  Amber N Craig; Zoë D Peterson; Erick Janssen; David Goodrich; Julia R Heiman
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2017-04-07

4.  Who Seeks Aggression in Pornography? Findings from Interviews with Viewers.

Authors:  Eran Shor
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-11-08

5.  Late positive potential to explicit sexual images associated with the number of sexual intercourse partners.

Authors:  Nicole Prause; Vaughn R Steele; Cameron Staley; Dean Sabatinelli
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  The cortisol response during physiological sexual arousal in adult women with a history of childhood sexual abuse.

Authors:  Alessandra H Rellini; Lisa Dawn Hamilton; Yvon Delville; Cindy M Meston
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2009-12

7.  Selection of film clips and development of a video for the investigation of sexual decision making among men who have sex with men.

Authors:  Sarah E Woolf-King; Stephen Maisto; Michael Carey; Peter Vanable
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2010-11

Review 8.  Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Heather A Rupp; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2007-08-01

9.  Sex-specific content preferences for visual sexual stimuli.

Authors:  Heather A Rupp; Kim Wallen
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2008-08-22

10.  Virtual Reality Erotica: Exploring General Presence, Sexual Presence, Sexual Arousal, and Sexual Desire in Women.

Authors:  Sonia Milani; Faith Jabs; Natalie B Brown; Bozena Zdaniuk; Alan Kingstone; Lori A Brotto
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-10-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.