| Literature DB >> 17667949 |
Chris Grilly1, Jesse Stricker, Wyming Lee Pang, Matthew R Bennett, Jeff Hasty.
Abstract
Protein decay rates are regulated by degradation machinery that clears unnecessary housekeeping proteins and maintains appropriate dynamic resolution for transcriptional regulators. Turnover rates are also crucial for fluorescence reporters that must strike a balance between sufficient fluorescence for signal detection and temporal resolution for tracking dynamic responses. Here, we use components of the Escherichia coli degradation machinery to construct a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain that allows for tunable degradation of a tagged protein. Using a microfluidic platform tailored for single-cell fluorescence measurements, we monitor protein decay rates after repression using an ssrA-tagged fluorescent reporter. We observe a half-life ranging from 91 to 22 min, depending on the level of activation of the degradation genes. Computational modeling of the underlying set of enzymatic reactions leads to GFP decay curves that are in excellent agreement with the observations, implying that degradation is governed by Michaelis-Menten-type interactions. In addition to providing a reporter with tunable dynamic resolution, our findings set the stage for explorations of the effect of protein degradation on gene regulatory and signalling pathways.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17667949 PMCID: PMC1943424 DOI: 10.1038/msb4100168
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Syst Biol ISSN: 1744-4292 Impact factor: 11.429
Figure 1Network diagram of the degradation module in yeast. The GAL1 production promoter drives repressible expression of yeast-enhanced GFP tagged with the ssrA tag. yEGFP is induced by galactose and repressed by glucose. Two separate copies of the LacI-repressible ADH1i promoter drive expression of E. coli ClpP or E. coli yClpX. ClpXP is induced by the addition of IPTG to bind to mLacI. The proteolytic complex ClpXP degrades ssrA-tagged proteins. A wild-type ADH1 promoter drives the expression of mLacI. All four cassettes are integrated into the yeast genome.
Figure 2Effect of the exogenous degradation machinery on CGD699. (A) Doubling times in batch culture for various strains and IPTG concentrations. Shown are the original strain (K699), two intermediate strains (K699 with yEGFP and K699 with yEGFP and ClpXP) and the complete strain (CGD699). (B) Flow cytometry forward scatter means for K699 and CGD699 for various IPTG concentrations. Note that varying the IPTG level (and therefore the resulting concentration of ClpXP) does not significantly affect the forward scatter. (C) Flow cytometry fluorescence means for CGD759 derivatives containing either untagged or ssrA-tagged yEGFP integration cassettes. CGD759 contains integrated clpP, clpX and lacI expression cassettes as in CGD699. Note that the addition of IPTG causes a loss of fluorescence only with ssrA-tagged yEGFP.
Figure 3Degradation of tagged GFP in yeast cells. (A) A series of images in both bright-field (above) and fluorescence (false colored, below) imaging of GFP decaying in yeast cells at 1 mM IPTG induction. The 90 min timestamp of the first image is 30 min after the media switch from galactose to glucose. (B) Representative time fluorescence trajectories of three cells in differing concentrations of IPTG. (C) Experimentally measured half-lives of yEGFP-ssrA as a function of IPTG concentration, compared to mean fluorescence. The black squares (half-lives; left y-axis) are determined from single-cell microscopy time trajectories. The red triangles (mean fluorescence; right y-axis) are derived from flow cytometry experiments. The x-axis is a discontinuous log scale. (D) Comparison of single-cell trajectories (symbols) to time series obtained from numerical integration of equation 1. Each trajectory was numerically fit to the data.