Literature DB >> 17659290

Side-artifact errors in yield strength and elastic modulus for human trabecular bone and their dependence on bone volume fraction and anatomic site.

Grant Bevill1, Sarah K Easley, Tony M Keaveny.   

Abstract

In the context of reconciling the mechanical properties of trabecular bone measured from in vitro mechanical testing with the true in situ behavior, recent attention has focused on the "side-artifact" which results from interruption of the trabecular network along the sides of machined specimens. The objective of this study was to compare the magnitude of the side-artifact error for measurements of elastic modulus vs. yield stress and to determine the dependence of these errors on anatomic site and trabecular micro-architecture. Using a series of parametric variations on micro-CT-based finite element models of trabecular bone from the human vertebral body (n=24) and femoral neck (n=10), side-artifact correction factors were quantified as the ratio of the side-artifact-free apparent mechanical property to the corresponding property measured in a typical experiment. The mean (+/-SD) correction factors for yield stress were 1.32+/-0.17 vs. 1.20+/-0.11 for the vertebral body and femoral neck (p<0.05), respectively, and the corresponding factors for modulus were 1.24+/-0.09 vs. 1.10+/-0.04 (p<0.0001). Correction factors were greater for yield stress than modulus (p<0.003), but no anatomic site effect was detected (p>0.29) after accounting for variations in bone volume fraction (BV/TV). Approximately 30-55% of the variation in the correction factors for modulus and yield stress could be accounted for by BV/TV or micro-architecture, representing an appreciable systematic component of the error. Although some scatter in the correction factor-BV/TV relationships may confound accurate correction of modulus and yield stress for individual specimens, side-artifact correction is nonetheless essential for obtaining accurate mean estimates of modulus and yield stress for a cohort of specimens. We conclude that appreciation and correction for the differential effects of the side-artifact in modulus vs. yield stress and their dependence on BV/TV may improve the interpretation of measured elastic and failure properties for trabecular bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17659290      PMCID: PMC2099450          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  22 in total

1.  Quantification of Bone Microarchitecture with the Structure Model Index.

Authors:  TOR Hildebrand; PETER Rüegsegger
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.763

2.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; Christopher E Cann; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  The effects of side-artifacts on the elastic modulus of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Kerem Un; Grant Bevill; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The underestimation of Young's modulus in compressive testing of cancellous bone specimens.

Authors:  A Odgaard; F Linde
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Systematic and random errors in compression testing of trabecular bone.

Authors:  T M Keaveny; T P Pinilla; R P Crawford; D L Kopperdahl; A Lou
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Osteoporosis changes the amount of vertebral trabecular bone at risk of fracture but not the vertebral load distribution.

Authors:  J Homminga; H Weinans; W Gowin; D Felsenberg; R Huiskes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models.

Authors:  B van Rietbergen; H Weinans; R Huiskes; A Odgaard
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Effects of specimen load-bearing and free surface layers on the compressive mechanical properties of cellular materials.

Authors:  M Zhu; T S Keller; D M Spengler
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Femoral prosthesis implantation induces changes in bone stress that depend on the extent of porous coating.

Authors:  H B Skinner; A S Kim; J H Keyak; C D Mote
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Influence of bone volume fraction and architecture on computed large-deformation failure mechanisms in human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Grant Bevill; Senthil K Eswaran; Atul Gupta; Panayiotis Papadopoulos; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  14 in total

1.  Modelling Young's modulus for porous bones with microstructural variation and anisotropy.

Authors:  Jianfeng F Wang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images.

Authors:  Dieter H Pahr; Philippe K Zysset
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Mechanical and microarchitectural analyses of cancellous bone through experiment and computer simulation.

Authors:  Ardiyansyah Syahrom; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Jaafar Abdullah; Andreas Öchsner
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Prediction of new clinical vertebral fractures in elderly men using finite element analysis of CT scans.

Authors:  Xiang Wang; Arnav Sanyal; Peggy M Cawthon; Lisa Palermo; Michael Jekir; John Christensen; Kristine E Ensrud; Steven R Cummings; Eric Orwoll; Dennis M Black; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Seeing double: a comparison of microstructure, biomechanical function, and adjacent disc health between double- and single-layer vertebral endplates.

Authors:  Aaron J Fields; Francisco Sahli; Azucena G Rodriguez; Jeffrey C Lotz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men.

Authors:  Eric S Orwoll; Lynn M Marshall; Carrie M Nielson; Steven R Cummings; Jodi Lapidus; Jane A Cauley; Kristine Ensrud; Nancy Lane; Paul R Hoffmann; David L Kopperdahl; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Femoral bone strength and its relation to cortical and trabecular changes after treatment with PTH, alendronate, and their combination as assessed by finite element analysis of quantitative CT scans.

Authors:  Tony M Keaveny; Paul F Hoffmann; Mandeep Singh; Lisa Palermo; John P Bilezikian; Susan L Greenspan; Dennis M Black
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Micromechanical analyses of vertebral trabecular bone based on individual trabeculae segmentation of plates and rods.

Authors:  X Sherry Liu; Grant Bevill; Tony M Keaveny; Paul Sajda; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Accuracy of finite element analyses of CT scans in predictions of vertebral failure patterns under axial compression and anterior flexion.

Authors:  Timothy M Jackman; Alex M DelMonaco; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Association of incident hip fracture with the estimated femoral strength by finite element analysis of DXA scans in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study.

Authors:  L Yang; N Parimi; E S Orwoll; D M Black; J T Schousboe; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.