Literature DB >> 17658789

Effect of surface polarity on water contact angle and interfacial hydration structure.

Nicolas Giovambattista1, Pablo G Debenedetti, Peter J Rossky.   

Abstract

We perform molecular dynamics simulations of water in the presence of hydrophobic/hydrophilic walls at T = 300 K and P = 0 GPa. For the hydrophilic walls, we use a hydroxylated silica model introduced in previous simulations [Lee, S. H.; Rossky, P. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 3334. Giovambattista, N.; Rossky, P. J.; Debenedetti, P. G.; Phys. Rev. E 2006, 73, 041604.]. By rescaling the physical partial atomic charges by a parameter 0 <or= k <or= 1, we can continuously transform the hydrophilic walls (hydroxylated silica, k = 1) into hydrophobic apolar surfaces (k = 0). From a physical point of view, k is the normalized magnitude of a surface dipole moment, and thus it quantifies the polarity of the surface. We calculate the contact angle of water for 0 <or= k <or= 1. We find that, at least for the present homogeneous, atomically flat, and defect-free surface model, the magnitude of the surface dipole correlates with the contact angle in a one-to-one correspondence. In particular, we find that polar surfaces with 0 < k <or= kc = 0.4 are macroscopically hydrophobic; that is, the contact angle is larger than 90 degrees . For the cutoff value k = kc, the magnitude of the dipole moment of the polar silica surface unit is 41% that of the water molecule dipole moment. We also study the water orientation distributions next to the walls (a microscopic property). We find that these distributions also correlate with the contact angle in a one-to-one correspondence. Thus, the structure of confined water, the surface polarity, and the contact angle are in a direct correspondence to each other, and therefore, each quantifies the hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity of the surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17658789     DOI: 10.1021/jp071957s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  35 in total

1.  Extended surfaces modulate hydrophobic interactions of neighboring solutes.

Authors:  Amish J Patel; Patrick Varilly; Sumanth N Jamadagni; Hari Acharya; Shekhar Garde; David Chandler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Hydrophobicity of protein surfaces: Separating geometry from chemistry.

Authors:  Nicolas Giovambattista; Carlos F Lopez; Peter J Rossky; Pablo G Debenedetti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Dewetting and hydrophobic interaction in physical and biological systems.

Authors:  Bruce J Berne; John D Weeks; Ruhong Zhou
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 12.703

4.  Enhanced surface hydrophobicity by coupling of surface polarity and topography.

Authors:  Nicolas Giovambattista; Pablo G Debenedetti; Peter J Rossky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Characterizing hydrophobicity of interfaces by using cavity formation, solute binding, and water correlations.

Authors:  Rahul Godawat; Sumanth N Jamadagni; Shekhar Garde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Liquid water can slip on a hydrophilic surface.

Authors:  Tuan Anh Ho; Dimitrios V Papavassiliou; Lloyd L Lee; Alberto Striolo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Test-area surface tension calculation of the graphene-methane interface: Fluctuations and commensurability.

Authors:  H D d'Oliveira; X Davoy; E Arche; P Malfreyt; A Ghoufi
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Effect of hydrophobic environments on the hypothesized liquid-liquid critical point of water.

Authors:  Elena G Strekalova; Dario Corradini; Marco G Mazza; Sergey V Buldyrev; Paola Gallo; Giancarlo Franzese; H Eugene Stanley
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 1.365

9.  Superwetting of TiO2 by light-induced water-layer growth via delocalized surface electrons.

Authors:  Kunyoung Lee; Qhwan Kim; Sangmin An; JeongHoon An; Jongwoo Kim; Bongsu Kim; Wonho Jhe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Hydrophobicity of rare-earth oxide ceramics.

Authors:  Gisele Azimi; Rajeev Dhiman; Hyuk-Min Kwon; Adam T Paxson; Kripa K Varanasi
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 43.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.