Literature DB >> 17655715

Impact of implant overloading on the peri-implant bone in inflamed and non-inflamed peri-implant mucosa.

Avital Kozlovsky1, Haim Tal, Ben-Zion Laufer, Roy Leshem, Michael D Rohrer, Miron Weinreb, Zvi Artzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of overloading on peri-implant bone level and the bone-to-implant contact (BIC) in the presence of healthy or inflamed peri-implant tissues.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four screw-shaped machined implants were placed bilaterally in the mandible of four beagle dogs and left submerged for 3 months. Prosthetic abutments were connected either in supra-occlusal contact with the opposite teeth (overloaded) or in infra-occlusal position (unloaded). In each dog, cotton floss ligatures were placed unilaterally around abutments to promote plaque accumulation; the contralateral side was brushed three times a week. There were four experimental sites, two implants in each: loaded uninflamed (LU), loaded inflamed (LI), unloaded uninflamed (UU), and unloaded inflamed (UI). Clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at baseline and every 3 months throughout the observation period. At 12 months, the dogs were sacrificed and histomorphometric analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Implants with ligature-induced peri-implantitis presented high inflammatory indices throughout the observation period. Clinical parameters did not change from baseline for both LU and UU. Loading significantly increased the percentage of BIC (BIC%) (P<0.05) and slightly increased crestal bone resorption, but not apical to the implant neck. Both LI and UI groups showed significant peri-implant bone loss (P<0.01), mostly horizontal on the buccal aspect and angular on the lingual aspect, which exposed implant threads. Loading significantly (P<0.05) increased implant thread exposure due to buccal and lingual vertical bone resorption.
CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of uninflamed peri-implant mucosa, overloading of implants in the dog model increased BIC% and slightly reduced marginal bone level. However, resorption did not progress beyond the implant neck. Overloading aggravated the plaque-induced bone resorption when peri-implant inflammation was present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17655715     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01374.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  17 in total

1.  Randomised study for the 1-year crestal bone maintenance around modified diameter implants with different loading protocols: a radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Pietro Tortora; Alessandro Quaranta; Vittoria Perrotti; Iole Vozza; Adriano Piattelli
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Lack of association between overload and peri-implant tissue loss in healthy conditions.

Authors:  Kelvin I Afrashtehfar; Cyrus Dm Afrashtehfar
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2016-09

3.  Effects of enamel matrix derivative on non-surgical management of peri-implant mucositis: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Atabak Kashefimehr; Reza Pourabbas; Masumeh Faramarzi; Ali Zarandi; Abouzar Moradi; Howard C Tenenbaum; Amir Azarpazhooh
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Animal models for periodontal regeneration and peri-implant responses.

Authors:  Alpdogan Kantarci; Hatice Hasturk; Thomas E Van Dyke
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.589

5.  Occlusal change in posterior implant-supported single crowns and its association with peri-implant bone level: a 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Qian Ding; Qiang Luo; Yajing Tian; Lei Zhang; Qiufei Xie; Yongsheng Zhou
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Comparison of the success rate of endodontic treatment and implant treatment.

Authors:  Ranya Faraj Elemam; Iain Pretty
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2011-06-15

7.  Influence of occlusal loading on peri-implant clinical parameters. A pilot study.

Authors:  Hilario Pellicer-Chover; José Viña-Almunia; Javier Romero-Millán; David Peñarrocha-Oltra; Berta García-Mira; María Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-05-01

8.  Ligature-induced peri-implant infection in crestal and subcrestal implants: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs.

Authors:  Baoxin Huang; Muzi Piao; Li Zhang; Xian'e Wang; Li Xu; Weidong Zhu; Huanxin Meng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Comparative evaluation of osseointegrated dental implants based on platform-switching concept: influence of diameter, length, thread shape, and in-bone positioning depth on stress-based performance.

Authors:  Luigi Baggi; Michele Di Girolamo; Giuseppe Vairo; Gianpaolo Sannino
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  Effect of cantilever length and alloy framework on the stress distribution in peri-implant area of cantilevered implant-supported fixed partial dentures.

Authors:  Valdey Suedam; Rafael Tobias Moretti Neto; Edson Antonio Capello Sousa; José Henrique Rubo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.