Literature DB >> 9015177

Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis.

H Körner1, K Söndenaa, J A Söreide, E Andersen, A Nysted, T H Lende, K H Kjellevold.   

Abstract

This prospective study was performed to investigate epidemiological characteristics in terms of the age- and sex-specific incidence in patients with perforated and nonperforated appendicitis. The study population comprised 1486 consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy for suspected acute appendicitis between 1989 and 1993. Two patient cohorts [n = 544 (37%)] were analyzed with regard to prehospitalization duration of symptoms and in-hospital observation time. The crude incidence of acute appendicitis was 86 per 100,000 per year. Although the incidence of nonperforated appendicitis was highest among adolescents and young adults (13-40 years of age), perforated appendicitis occurred at almost the same incidence in all sex and age groups. The diagnostic accuracy was 76%. Perforated appendicitis occurred in 19%, with higher rates in small children and the elderly, irrespective of gender. A high diagnostic accuracy was not associated with an increased rate of perforation. In small children and the elderly, the diagnostic accuracy was low and the perforation rate high. Patients with perforation had a significantly longer duration of symptoms as well as in-hospital observation time than did patients with nonperforated appendicitis. Perforated appendicitis showed a different incidence pattern than nonperforated appendicitis and was associated with a significantly longer duration of symptoms and in-hospital observation time, probably due to patient-related factors. We suggest this observation deserves attention regarding clinical diagnosis and treatment decision-making for patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9015177     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  83 in total

1.  Clinical judgment remains of great value in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Eric Bergeron
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Incidence of visualization of the normal appendix on different MRI sequences.

Authors:  Paul Nikolaidis; Nancy Hammond; Jamie Marko; Frank H Miller; Nicholas Papanicolaou; Vahid Yaghmai
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-05-24

3.  Ruptured appendicitis among children as an indicator of access to care.

Authors:  A Gadomski; P Jenkins
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Type II error in a randomized controlled trial of appendectomy vs. antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Hartwig Kørner; Jon Arne Søreide
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Conservative treatment in uncomplicated acute appendicitis: reassessment of practice safety.

Authors:  Zvi Steiner; Genady Buklan; Rodica Stackievicz; Michael Gutermacher; Ita Litmanovitz; Guy Golani; Shmuel Arnon
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 6.  [Strategy for avoidance of negative appendectomies].

Authors:  M N Wente; H Waleczek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has a close association with gangrenous appendicitis in patients undergoing appendectomy.

Authors:  Mitsuru Ishizuka; Takayuki Shimizu; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

8.  Prostate cancer with an unusual metastatic affinity for the appendix, inducing acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Erasmia Christou
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-03-20

9.  The Influence of the Appendiceal Base Diameter on Appendix Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

Authors:  Samir Delibegović; Zlatan Mehmedović
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Time to appendectomy and risk of perforation in acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; Neli E Mottey; Ellen T Farrokhi; Michael G Florence; Morris G Johnson; Charles Mock; Scott R Steele; Richard C Thirlby; David R Flum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 14.766

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.