BACKGROUND: Despite growing emphasis on public reporting of health care quality data, available data are often ignored. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of web-based physician-level data for patients choosing a new primary care physician (PCP). DESIGN: Patients seeking a new PCP (n = 2225) were invited to view web-based information including PCP credentials, personal characteristics, office location and hours, and patient experience scores. Patient experience scores included validated measures of interpersonal quality, appointment access, care coordination, health promotion, and patient recommendations of the PCP. After viewing the website, participants indicated their preferred PCP and completed a study questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the invited participants, 17% visited the website (n = 382). Patient experience scores were cited most frequently as important to physician choice (51%). Among these measures, patients' highest priorities were interpersonal quality (37%) and patient recommendations of the PCP (41%). For patients citing these priorities, the odds of choosing a highly scored physician after viewing the data was nearly 10 times that of choosing such a physician by chance (odds ratio (OR) = 9.52 and 9.71, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Targeting patients known to be making a health care decision appears to promote the use of performance data. Patients particularly valued data concerning other patients' experiences and, after viewing the data, made choices well-aligned with their priorities.
BACKGROUND: Despite growing emphasis on public reporting of health care quality data, available data are often ignored. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of web-based physician-level data for patients choosing a new primary care physician (PCP). DESIGN:Patients seeking a new PCP (n = 2225) were invited to view web-based information including PCP credentials, personal characteristics, office location and hours, and patient experience scores. Patient experience scores included validated measures of interpersonal quality, appointment access, care coordination, health promotion, and patient recommendations of the PCP. After viewing the website, participants indicated their preferred PCP and completed a study questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the invited participants, 17% visited the website (n = 382). Patient experience scores were cited most frequently as important to physician choice (51%). Among these measures, patients' highest priorities were interpersonal quality (37%) and patient recommendations of the PCP (41%). For patients citing these priorities, the odds of choosing a highly scored physician after viewing the data was nearly 10 times that of choosing such a physician by chance (odds ratio (OR) = 9.52 and 9.71, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Targeting patients known to be making a health care decision appears to promote the use of performance data. Patients particularly valued data concerning other patients' experiences and, after viewing the data, made choices well-aligned with their priorities.
Authors: Hector P Rodriguez; Ted von Glahn; William H Rogers; Hong Chang; Gary Fanjiang; Dana Gelb Safran Journal: Med Care Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Constance H Fung; Marc N Elliott; Ron D Hays; Katherine L Kahn; David E Kanouse; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Mark D Spranca; Paul G Shekelle Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Marjan J Faber; Signe Flottorp; Liv Helen Rygh; Katherine H O Deane; Martin P Eccles Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-11-09
Authors: James S Kahn; Joan F Hilton; T Van Nunnery; Skip Leasure; Kelly M Bryant; C Bradley Hare; David H Thom Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Sean J Meredith; Paul E Matuszewski; Michael P Smuda; Evin Taskoy; Scott Koenig; Vidushan Nadarajah; Jonathan D Packer; R Frank Henn Journal: J Clin Orthop Trauma Date: 2020-04-13
Authors: Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Marten Munneke; Bastiaan R Bloem; Gert P Westert; Marjan J Faber Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 2.655