Literature DB >> 16033487

Patients' preferences for technical versus interpersonal quality when selecting a primary care physician.

Constance H Fung1, Marc N Elliott, Ron D Hays, Katherine L Kahn, David E Kanouse, Elizabeth A McGlynn, Mark D Spranca, Paul G Shekelle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess patients' use of and preferences for information about technical and interpersonal quality when using simulated, computerized health care report cards to select a primary care provider (PCP). DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Primary data collected from 304 adult consumers living in Los Angeles County in January and February 2003. STUDY DESIGN/DATA COLLECTION: We constructed computerized report cards for seven pairs of hypothetical individual PCPs (two internal validity check pairs included). Participants selected the physician that they preferred. A questionnaire collected demographic information and assessed participant attitudes towards different sources of report card information. The relationship between patient characteristics and number of times the participant selected the physician who excelled in technical quality are estimated using an ordered logit model. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Ninety percent of the sample selected the dominant physician for both validity checks, indicating a level of attention to task comparable with prior studies. When presented with pairs of physicians who varied in technical and interpersonal quality, two-thirds of the sample (95 percent CI: 62, 72 percent) chose the physician who was higher in technical quality at least three out of five times (one-sample binomial test of proportion). Age, gender, and ethnicity were not significant predictors of choosing the physician who was higher in technical quality.
CONCLUSIONS: These participants showed a strong preference for physicians of high technical quality when forced to make tradeoffs, but a substantial proportion of the sample preferred physicians of high interpersonal quality. Individual physician report cards should contain ample information in both domains to be most useful to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16033487      PMCID: PMC1361181          DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00395.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  28 in total

Review 1.  What cognitive science tells us about the design of reports for consumers.

Authors:  Mary E Vaiana; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  Increasing the impact of health plan report cards by addressing consumers' concerns.

Authors:  J H Hibbard; L Harris-Kojetin; P Mullin; J Lubalin; S Garfinkel
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the quality of care.

Authors:  Ashish K Jha; Jonathan B Perlin; Kenneth W Kizer; R Adams Dudley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  America's best hospitals.

Authors:  Avery Comarow
Journal:  US News World Rep       Date:  2003 Jul 28-Aug 4

5.  Effects of CAHPS health plan performance information on plan choices by New Jersey Medicaid beneficiaries.

Authors:  Donna O Farley; Pamela Farley Short; Marc N Elliott; David E Kanouse; Julie A Brown; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Inconsistent report cards: assessing the comparability of various measures of the quality of ambulatory care.

Authors:  Tejal K Gandhi; E Cook Francis; Ann Louise Puopolo; Helen R Burstin; Jennifer S Haas; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Informing consumer decisions in health care: implications from decision-making research.

Authors:  J H Hibbard; P Slovic; J J Jewett
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Strategies for reporting health plan performance information to consumers: evidence from controlled studies.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Paul Slovic; Ellen Peters; Melissa L Finucane
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain.

Authors:  M Wensing; H P Jung; J Mainz; F Olesen; R Grol
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Comprehension of quality care indicators: differences among privately insured, publicly insured, and uninsured.

Authors:  J J Jewett; J H Hibbard
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1996
View more
  41 in total

1.  In the eyes of the beholder: population perspectives on performance priorities for primary care in Canada.

Authors:  Whitney Berta; Jan Barnsley; Adalsteinn Brown; Michael Murray
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-11

2.  Community preferences in general practice: important factors for choosing a general practitioner.

Authors:  Patricia Kenny; Richard De Abreu Lourenco; Chun Yee Wong; Marion Haas; Stephen Goodall
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Do early career indicators of clinical skill predict subsequent career outcomes and practice characteristics for general internists?

Authors:  Bradley Gray; James Reschovsky; Eric Holmboe; Rebecca Lipner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Validation of a trust in medical technology instrument.

Authors:  Enid Montague
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Use of Accessible Examination Tables in the Primary Care Setting: A Survey of Physical Evaluations and Patient Attitudes.

Authors:  Megan A Morris; Allysha C Maragh-Bass; Joan M Griffin; Lila J Finney Rutten; Tara Lagu; Sean Phelan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The role of outpatient facilities in explaining variations in risk-adjusted readmission rates between hospitals.

Authors:  Scott A Lorch; Michael Baiocchi; Jeffrey H Silber; Orit Even-Shoshan; Gabriel J Escobar; Dylan S Small
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Staff perception of relative importance of quality dimensions for patients at tertiary public services in oman.

Authors:  Ismail Alrashdi; Ahmed Al Qasmi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2012-09

8.  Interpersonal processes of care survey: patient-reported measures for diverse groups.

Authors:  Anita L Stewart; Anna M Nápoles-Springer; Steven E Gregorich; Jasmine Santoyo-Olsson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  The relationship between multimorbidity and patients' ratings of communication.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Claude M Setodji; Fuan-Yue Kung; Joan Keesey; Steven M Asch; John Adams; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities.

Authors:  Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi; Arne Risa Hole; Nicola Mead; Ruth McDonald; Diane Whalley; Peter Bower; Martin Roland
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.