Literature DB >> 17653544

Posterior single-incision approach to minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.

T V Swanson1.   

Abstract

Enhanced surgical techniques and instrumentation enable surgeons to perform total hip arthroplasties through minimally invasive approaches. Using incisions typically less than 10 cm in length, surgeons can achieve adequate visualization of the surgical site while minimizing trauma to deep soft tissues. Associated reductions in morbidity should allow for improved rehabilitation and recovery. Although these techniques have been met with some controversy, a number of recent studies appear to attest to their safety and efficacy. Many of these studies have concentrated on a posterior single-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty. Favorable results for such outcomes as operative times, complication rates, pain, functional recovery, and blood loss have been reported, and patient satisfaction has been high. If surgeons and their patients are to achieve maximum benefit from minimally invasive total hip arthroplasties, it will be necessary to design effective educational tools that address the learning curve associated with these approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17653544      PMCID: PMC2267518          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0436-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  36 in total

1.  Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach.

Authors:  Robert E Kennon; John M Keggi; Robert S Wetmore; Laurine E Zatorski; Michael H Huo; Kristaps J Keggi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wayne M Goldstein; Jill J Branson; Kimberly A Berland; Alexander C Gordon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Direct two-incision total hip replacement without fluoroscopy.

Authors:  John F Irving
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jonathan R Howell; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation.

Authors:  Anthony M DiGioia; Anton Y Plakseychuk; Timothy J Levison; Branislav Jaramaz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  T R Light; K J Keggi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  The mini-incision approach to total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas P Sculco; Louis C Jordan
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2004

8.  Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: technique and results.

Authors:  Richard A Berger
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the Hospital for Special Surgery experience.

Authors:  Thomas P Sculco; Louis C Jordan; William L Walter
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.472

10.  Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach.

Authors:  Richard A Berger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  What is the role of minimally invasive surgery in a fast track hip and knee replacement pathway?

Authors:  J M Lloyd; T Wainwright; R G Middleton
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Vicky Blake; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Cheng; J G Feng; T Liu; X L Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The mini postero-postero-lateral mini incision in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Frederic Jacquot; Mokrane Ait Mokhtar; Alain Sautet; Levon Doursounian; Alain-Charles Masquelet; Jean-Marc Feron
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Learning curves in hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Kristian Bjorgul; Wendy M Novicoff; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Heterotopic ossification after hemiarthroplasty of the hip - A comparison of three common approaches.

Authors:  Chad M Corrigan; Sarah E Greenberg; Vasanth Sathiyakumar; Phillip M Mitchell; Arie Francis; Adan Omar; Rachel V Thakore; William T Obremskey; Manish K Sethi
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-12-26

7.  Comparison of short-term outcomes between SuperPATH approach and conventional approaches in hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Nikolai Ramadanov; Simon Bueschges; Kuiliang Liu; Roman Klein; Ruediger Schultka
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Direct anterior approach (DAA) vs. conventional approaches in total hip arthroplasty: A RCT meta-analysis with an overview of related meta-analyses.

Authors:  Philip Lazaru; Simon Bueschges; Nikolai Ramadanov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  High complication rate in the early experience of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty by the direct anterior approach.

Authors:  Y M den Hartog; S B W Vehmeijer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.