Literature DB >> 15062701

Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study.

Jonathan R Howell1, Bassam A Masri, Clive P Duncan.   

Abstract

The results of the authors' study show that total hip arthroplasty can be performed safely through a minimal incision anterolateral approach. The authors' early results with this technique have demonstrated an increase in the length of operation compared with a standard approach, despite selection of smaller patients, but the authors expect this result will change with further experience. No benefit has been found with respect to perioperative blood loss, but the authors' results do suggest that for patients without additional medical problems, this technique may lead to a reduction in the length of hospital stay. Further study is required to clarify the benefits conferred by a minimal incision anterolateral approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15062701     DOI: 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00137-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  27 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Vicky Blake; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Comparison of total hip replacements cup orientation and position. Navigation vs. conventional manual implantation of hip prostheses].

Authors:  M Honl; K Schwieger; C H Gauck; F Lampe; M M Morlock; M A Wimmer; E Hille
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Comparison of total hip arthroplasty via a posterior mini-incision versus a classic anterolateral approach].

Authors:  M Rittmeister; A Peters
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Cheng; J G Feng; T Liu; X L Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  [The minimally invasive anterolateral approach. A review of the literature].

Authors:  A Roth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  The mode of antifungal action of plant, insect and human defensins.

Authors:  A M Aerts; I E J A François; B P A Cammue; K Thevissen
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Susan G Capps
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  [The standard implantation of a total hip prosthesis via two incisions (the Yale Technique)].

Authors:  Robert Kipping
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 9.  Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Inge H F Reininga; Wiebren Zijlstra; Robert Wagenmakers; Alexander L Boerboom; Bregtje P Huijbers; Johan W Groothoff; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  [Complications after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  R Hube; M Dienst; P von Roth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.