Literature DB >> 17645999

CZT detectors: How important is energy resolution for nuclear breast imaging?

Carrie B Hruska1, Michael K O'connor.   

Abstract

Semiconductor detectors, such as Cadmium Zinc Telluride (CZT), offer improved energy resolution (ER) and potentially improved tumor contrast in breast imaging. We evaluated the effect of changes in ER on tumor contrast. Studies were performed on a prototype CZT detector, a commercial CZT-based system, a multicrystal CsI system and a conventional NaI system. The same low energy high resolution collimator was used on each system and the same total counts (250 kcts) were acquired in each image. CZ-Tmodules in a detector can exhibit different ERs. We imaged a breast phantom containing 4 tumors (diameters 4.9, 7.2, 7.2, and 9.8 mm) over individual CZT modules with intrinsic ers of 5.8-17.5%. Tumor to background ratio was 6.2:1 and tumors were placed 1 and 4 cm deep in the 6-cm thick breast phantom. A standard +/-10% energy window and narrower energy windows (-5%/+10% and -7%/ +10%) were used. Tumor contrast was determined by maximum tumor intensity divided by mean background intensity. Tumor contrast was not significantly affected by differences in ER between CZT modules. Tumor contrast improved by 2-10% with a narrow energy window. At the same ER, the CZT systems yielded slightly better contrast than the CsI system. All pixilated systems performed better than the NaI system. Scatter in the breast was found to be low and accounts for only approximately 11% of counts in a +/-10% energy window for a 6 cm- thick breast. No strong relationship was observed between ER and tumor detectability, which may be due to low scatter in the breast. Detector element size in pixilated systems appears to be more important than ER in determining tumor contrast.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 17645999     DOI: 10.1016/S1120-1797(06)80029-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  6 in total

1.  Simulation study comparing high-purity germanium and cadmium zinc telluride detectors for breast imaging.

Authors:  D L Campbell; T E Peterson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Radiation dose reduction using a CdZnTe-based computed tomography system: comparison to flat-panel detectors.

Authors:  Q Le Huy; Justin L Ducote; Sabee Molloi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  SPECT detectors: the Anger Camera and beyond.

Authors:  Todd E Peterson; Lars R Furenlid
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Molecular Breast Imaging using Synthetic Projections from High-Purity Germanium Detectors: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Desmond Campbell; Todd Peterson
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-11

6.  Intraoperative biophotonic imaging systems for image-guided interventions.

Authors:  Salar Sajedi; Hamid Sabet; Hak Soo Choi
Journal:  Nanophotonics       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 8.449

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.