Literature DB >> 17645178

Repetition blindness is orientation blind.

Michael C Corballis1, Cole Armstrong.   

Abstract

In identifying rapid sequences of three letters, subjects were worse at identifying the first and third letters when they were the same than when they were different, indicating repetition blindness (RB). This effect occurred regardless of the angular orientations of the letters, but was more pronounced when the orientations of the repeated letters were different than when they were the same. In a second experiment, RB was also evident when the first and third letters were lowercase bs or ds, presented upright or inverted, even though they are differently named when inverted (q and p, respectively). Conversely, a third experiment showed that RB occurred when the letters had the same names but were repeated in different case. These results suggest that the early extraction of letter shape is independent of its orientation and left-right sense, and that RB can occur at the levels of both shape and name.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17645178     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  28 in total

1.  A system for shape recognition.

Authors:  J A DEUTSCH
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Orientation congruency effects for familiar objects: coordinate transformations in object recognition.

Authors:  M Graf; D Kaping; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-03

3.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition.

Authors:  H H Bülthoff; S Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation.

Authors:  N G Kanwisher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-11

5.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Effects of orientation on the identification of simple visual patterns.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur; M J Landau
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1984-03

7.  Repetition blindness in rapid lists: activation and inhibition versus construction and attribution.

Authors:  Bruce W A Whittlesea; Michael E J Masson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Winding one's ps and qs: mental rotation and mirror-image discrimination.

Authors:  M C Corballis; R McLaren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Visual and phonological codes in repetition blindness.

Authors:  D Bavelier; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Determinants of repetition blindness.

Authors:  J Park; N Kanwisher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  4 in total

1.  Two scenes or not two scenes: The effects of stimulus repetition and view-similarity on scene categorization from brief displays.

Authors:  Martin J Goldzieher; Sally Andrews; Irina M Harris
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-01

2.  Orientation unbound: dissociation of identity and orientation under rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  Michael C Corballis; Cole Armstrong; Zhuoying Zhu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

3.  Survival of the grouped, or three's a crowd? Repetition blindness in groups of letters and words.

Authors:  Andrea Jackson; Lori Buchanan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02

4.  Can rotated words be processed automatically? Evidence from rotated repetition priming.

Authors:  András Benyhe; Péter Csibri
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-03-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.