Literature DB >> 6232348

Winding one's ps and qs: mental rotation and mirror-image discrimination.

M C Corballis, R McLaren.   

Abstract

Subjects were timed as they made judgments about ps and qs (also interpretable as ds and bs) in different angular orientations. Whether these judgments were left-right mirror-image discriminations (b vs. d or p vs. q) or up-down mirror-image discriminations (b vs. p or d vs. q), the subjects' reaction times increased sharply with the angular departure of each letter from its designated normal upright orientation, a fact implying mental rotation. This was so whether the subjects responded with the letter labels themselves (e.g., b vs. d) or with the labels left versus right or top versus bottom. It was again the case when the letters were replaced by nonletter forms, in which event there was also a left visual-field advantage in reaction time. This study is therefore the first to demonstrate a mental-rotation strategy when the canonical forms to be discriminated are up-down mirror images as well as when they are left-right mirror images. In both cases, however, the task requires the ability to tell left from right, and we suggest that this is the critical ingredient that induces mental rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6232348     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.2.318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  11 in total

1.  Much ado about mirrors.

Authors:  M C Corballis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  A model of rotated mirror/normal letter discriminations.

Authors:  Eva Kung; Jeff P Hamm
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-03

3.  Cognitive abilities in Malawi cichlids (Pseudotropheus sp.): matching-to-sample and image/mirror-image discriminations.

Authors:  Stefanie Gierszewski; Horst Bleckmann; Vera Schluessel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Individual differences in the mixture ratio of rotation and nonrotation trials during rotated mirror/normal letter discriminations.

Authors:  Jordan A Searle; Jeff P Hamm
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

5.  Decisions about the axes of disoriented shapes.

Authors:  M C Corballis; S Cullen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-01

6.  Orientation perception in Williams Syndrome: discrimination and integration.

Authors:  Melanie Palomares; Barbara Landau; Howard Egeth
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Necessary Contributions of Human Frontal Lobe Subregions to Reward Learning in a Dynamic, Multidimensional Environment.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; Lesley K Fellows
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Repetition blindness is orientation blind.

Authors:  Michael C Corballis; Cole Armstrong
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

9.  Object Recognition Can Be Viewpoint Dependent or Invariant - It's Just a Matter of Time and Task.

Authors:  Branka Milivojevic
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Inversion Reveals Perceptual Asymmetries in the Configural Processing of Human Body.

Authors:  Daniele Marzoli; Chiara Lucafò; Caterina Padulo; Giulia Prete; Laura Giacinto; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.