Literature DB >> 17645173

The representation of explicit motor sequence knowledge.

Robert Knee1, Sean Thomason, James Ashe, Daniel T Willingham.   

Abstract

Much research has investigated the representation of implicitly learned motor sequences: Do subjects learn sequences of stimuli, responses, response locations, or some combination? Most of the work on this subject indicates that when sequences are learned implicitly, it is in terms of response locations. The present work investigated the representation of explicitly learned motor sequences. In four experiments, we found consistent evidence that explicitly learned sequences are represented in terms of stimulus locations. This conclusion held true for both self-report measures (subjects said that they learned stimuli) and performance measures, but when stimuli changed, performance degraded. We interpret these data in a multiple-memory-systems framework.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17645173     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  27 in total

1.  Motor learning of compatible and incompatible visuomotor maps.

Authors:  S T Grafton; J Salidis; D B Willingham
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations.

Authors:  D B Willingham; L A Wells; J M Farrell; M E Stemwedel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

3.  Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction task.

Authors:  M Ziessler; D Nattkemper
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Pure perceptual-based sequence learning.

Authors:  Gilbert Remillard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Serial pattern learning by event observation.

Authors:  J H Howard; S A Mutter; D V Howard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning.

Authors:  Daniel B Willingham; Joanna Salidis; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  The neurobiology of category learning.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; Brian J Spiering
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2004-06

8.  Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.

Authors:  U Mayr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  On the development of procedural knowledge.

Authors:  D B Willingham; M J Nissen; P Bullemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning.

Authors:  M Ziessler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Representing serial action and perception.

Authors:  Elger L Abrahamse; Luis Jiménez; Willem B Verwey; Benjamin A Clegg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

2.  Implicit learning of fifth- and sixth-order sequential probabilities.

Authors:  Gilbert Remillard
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

3.  An egocentric frame of reference in implicit motor sequence learning.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; James Ashe; Daniel T Willingham
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-02-15

4.  Perceptual sequence learning in a serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Sunbin Song; James H Howard; Darlene V Howard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Evidence for separate representations for action and location in implicit motor sequencing.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Daniel T Willingham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

6.  Incidental and intentional sequence learning in youth-onset psychosis and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

Authors:  Canan Karatekin; Tonya White; Christopher Bingham
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Generalisation of new sequence knowledge depends on response modality.

Authors:  Clive R Rosenthal; Tammy W C Ng; Christopher Kennard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Defining the Parameters of Incidental Learning on a Serial Reaction Time (SRT) Task: Do Conscious Rules Apply?

Authors:  Lynne A Barker
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2012-12-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.