Literature DB >> 17639277

Variance of landmarks in digital evaluations: comparison between CT-based and conventional digital lateral cephalometric radiographs.

Michael Greiner1, Annette Greiner, Ursula Hirschfelder.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to examine whether bony, dental and soft tissue landmarks could be placed in CT-based lateral cephalograms with the same precision as in conventional digital lateral cephalograms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients without craniofacial dysplasia (2 female, 7 male, aged 12.8-32.3) who had undergone a lateral cephalogram and CT examination within an interval of a maximum of 6.5 months were selected in retrospect. The lateral cephalograms were done with the ORTHOPHOS Plus DS Ceph, and the CT examination with the SOMATOM Sensation 16 or 64 scanner. The CT-based cephalograms were generated with the VoXim 4.3 program based on axial CT reconstructions in the bone window. The cephalograms were analyzed using the Onyx Ceph 2.7 software by 2 orthodontists and 5 postgraduate students, each cephalogram being examined five times by each examiner on different days. Statistics were compiled with SPSS 13.0 and 14.0 based on the deviation from the individual mean value of each landmark.
RESULTS: The descriptive statistics showed in the conventional cephalogram, averaged over all 61 landmarks, a mean quartile range of on average 0.62 mm in the horizontal and 0.67 mm in the vertical axes. The CT-based cephalograms ranged between 0.64 mm horizontally and 0.74 mm vertically. The statistics comparing the two types of images with the Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed no significant difference.
CONCLUSION: When a CT scan is necessary for assessment of complex craniofacial dysplasias, an orthodontic-specific diagnosis is possible without having to resort to conventional X-rays of the skull. The data from this study demonstrate that it is possible to construct a cephalogram from CT data, which can be analyzed in the same way as a conventional cephalogram provided that the CT's field of view is large enough.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17639277     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-007-0710-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.

Authors:  U Oz; K Orhan; N Abe
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms.

Authors:  E L Delamare; G S Liedke; M B Vizzotto; H L D da Silveira; J L D Ribeiro; H E D Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.

Authors:  Olivier J C van Vlijmen; Frits A Rangel; Stefaan J Bergé; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Alfred G Becking; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Assessing bone volume for orthodontic miniplate fixation below the maxillary frontal process.

Authors:  T M Präger; H G Brochhagen; R Mischkowski; P-G Jost-Brinkmann; R Müller-Hartwich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Orthodontic archwire in the nasal cavity. A case report.

Authors:  Ramona Nicolas; Georg Eggers; Gerda Komposch
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Accuracy of anatomical landmark identification using different CBCT- and MSCT-based 3D images: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Jürgen Medelnik; Klaus Hertrich; Stefanie Steinhäuser-Andresen; Ursula Hirschfelder; Elisabeth Hofmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Bone condition of the maxillary zygomatic process prior to orthodontic anchorage plate fixation.

Authors:  T M Präger; H G Brochhagen; R Mischkowski; P G Jost-Brinkmann; R Müller-Hartwich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  MRI vs. CT for orthodontic applications: comparison of two MRI protocols and three CT (multislice, cone-beam, industrial) technologies.

Authors:  Andreas Detterbeck; Michael Hofmeister; Elisabeth Hofmann; Daniel Haddad; Daniel Weber; Astrid Hölzing; Simon Zabler; Matthias Schmid; Karl-Heinz Hiller; Peter Jakob; Jens Engel; Jochen Hiller; Ursula Hirschfelder
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  The topography of displaced canines: a 3D-CT study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Hofmann; Melanie Rodich; Ursula Hirschfelder
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Investigation of bone conditions for orthodontic anchorage plates in the anterior mandible.

Authors:  Thomas Michael Präger; Hans Georg Brochhagen; Axel Mußler; Robert Mischkowski; Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann; Ralf Müller-Hartwich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.