Literature DB >> 17629986

Minimally invasive operative management for lumbar spinal stenosis: overview of early and long-term outcomes.

Farbod Asgarzadie1, Larry T Khoo.   

Abstract

Standard open posterior decompression is well established and familiar to virtually all spine surgeons. However, this traditional surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is often associated with significant postoperative pain, disability, and dysfunction. This article reviews the use of a minimally invasive microendoscopic approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar stenosis by way of a unilateral approach. This technique has been shown to provide symptomatic relief equivalent to that of open discectomy, with significant reductions in operative blood loss, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and narcotic usage. Furthermore, the article explains the rationale, indications, and surgical techniques for minimally-invasive LSS surgery and presents the authors' 4-year outcomes data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17629986     DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  20 in total

Review 1.  Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Louise H Anderson; Teresa Nelson; Vikas V Patel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-09

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new AxiaLIF technique for two-level lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Serkan Erkan; Chunhui Wu; Amir A Mehbod; Brian Hsu; Douglas W Pahl; Ensor E Transfeldt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Unilateral tubular approach for bilateral laminotomy: effect on ipsilateral and contralateral buttock and leg pain.

Authors:  Marjan Alimi; Christoph P Hofstetter; Jose M Torres-Campa; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Guang-Ting Cong; Innocent Njoku; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Minimally invasive procedures on the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Jeffrey Gilligan; Holt S Cutler; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Limited laminectomy and restorative spinoplasty in spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Sukhbir Singh Sangwan; Rakesh Garg; Paritosh Gogna; Zile Singh Kundu; Vinay Gupta; Pradeep Kamboj
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-08-19

Review 7.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: who should be fused? An updated review.

Authors:  Farzad Omidi-Kashani; Ebrahim Ghayem Hasankhani; Amir Ashjazadeh
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-08-19

8.  Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jwo-Luen Pao; Wein-Chin Chen; Po-Quang Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Outpatient minimally invasive spine surgery using endoscopy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis among obese patients.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Hudak; Michael W Perry
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-03

10.  Clinical and radiological outcomes following microscopic decompression utilizing tubular retractor or conventional microscopic decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis with a minimum of 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Gun Woo Lee; Soo-Jin Jang; Seung Mok Shin; Jae-Ho Jang; Jae-Do Kim
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.