Literature DB >> 17626039

Ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke reflect hemispheric specializations for movement control.

Sydney Y Schaefer1, Kathleen Y Haaland, Robert L Sainburg.   

Abstract

Recent reports of functional impairment in the 'unaffected' limb of stroke patients have suggested that these deficits vary with the side of lesion. This not only supports the idea that the ipsilateral hemisphere contributes to arm movements, but also implies that such contributions are lateralized. We have previously suggested that the left and right hemispheres are specialized for controlling different features of movement. In reaching movements, the non-dominant arm appears better adapted for achieving accurate final positions and the dominant arm for specifying initial trajectory features, such as movement direction and peak acceleration. The purpose of this study was to determine whether different features of control could characterize ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke. Healthy control subjects and patients with either left- or right-hemisphere damage performed targeted single-joint elbow movements of different amplitudes in their ipsilateral hemispace. We predicted that left-hemisphere damage would produce deficits in specification of initial trajectory features, while right-hemisphere damage would produce deficits in final position accuracy. Consistent with our predictions, patients with left, but not right, hemisphere damage showed reduced modulation of acceleration amplitude. However, patients with right, but not left, hemisphere damage showed significantly larger errors in final position, which corresponded to reduced modulation of acceleration duration. Neither patient group differed from controls in terms of movement speed. Instead, the mechanisms by which speed was specified, through modulation of acceleration amplitude and modulation of acceleration duration, appeared to be differentially affected by left- and right-hemisphere damage. These findings support the idea that each hemisphere contributes differentially to the control of initial trajectory and final position, and that ipsilesional deficits following stroke reflect this lateralization in control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17626039      PMCID: PMC3769213          DOI: 10.1093/brain/awm145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  69 in total

1.  Compensation for loads during arm movements using equilibrium-point control.

Authors:  P L Gribble; D J Ostry
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Recovery of ipsilateral dexterity after stroke.

Authors:  A Sunderland
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching.

Authors:  R L Sainburg; D Kalakanis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Deconstructing apraxia: understanding disorders of intentional movement after stroke.

Authors:  Lisa Koski; Marco Iacoboni; John C Mazziotta
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.710

5.  Joint-angle-dependent neuromuscular dysfunctions at the wrist in persons after stroke.

Authors:  Xiaoling Hu; Kaiyu Tong; Vincent S Tsang; Rong Song
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Constraint-induced therapy for moderate chronic upper extremity impairment after stroke.

Authors:  N M Bonifer; K M Anderson; D B Arciniegas
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 7.  Handedness: differential specializations for control of trajectory and position.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.230

8.  Cerebellar ataxia: torque deficiency or torque mismatch between joints?

Authors:  A J Bastian; K M Zackowski; W T Thach
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Does motor lateralization have implications for stroke rehabilitation?

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Susan V Duff
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2006 May-Jun

10.  Lateralization of motor adaptation reveals independence in control of trajectory and steady-state position.

Authors:  Susan V Duff; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.064

View more
  98 in total

1.  Critical neural substrates for correcting unexpected trajectory errors and learning from them.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Asymmetry in grasp force matching and sense of effort.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Samantha Scotland; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Contribution of the primary motor cortex to motor imagery: a subthreshold TMS study.

Authors:  Barbara Pelgrims; Nicolas Michaux; Etienne Olivier; Michael Andres
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Relationship of diminished interjoint coordination after stroke to hand path consistency.

Authors:  Geetanjali Gera; Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Aging reduces asymmetries in interlimb transfer of visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jinsung Wang; Andrzej Przybyla; Kati Wuebbenhorst; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Coordination deficits in ideomotor apraxia during visually targeted reaching reflect impaired visuomotor transformations.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Robert L Sainburg; Kathleen Y Haaland
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Motor asymmetry in elite fencers.

Authors:  Selcuk Akpinar; Robert L Sainburg; Sadettin Kirazci; Andrzej Przybyla
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 1.328

8.  Ipsilateral versus contralateral cortical motor projections to a shoulder adductor in chronic hemiparetic stroke: implications for the expression of arm synergies.

Authors:  Susan Schwerin; Julius P A Dewald; Matthew Haztl; Steven Jovanovich; Michael Nickeas; Colum MacKinnon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Interlimb differences in coordination of rapid wrist/forearm movements.

Authors:  Gautum A Srinivasan; Tarika Embar; Robert Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effect of auditory feedback differs according to side of hemiparesis: a comparative pilot study.

Authors:  Johanna V G Robertson; Thomas Hoellinger; Påvel Lindberg; Djamel Bensmail; Sylvain Hanneton; Agnès Roby-Brami
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.