Literature DB >> 8548894

Myocardial rubidium-82 tissue kinetics assessed by dynamic positron emission tomography as a marker of myocardial cell membrane integrity and viability.

J vom Dahl1, O Muzik, E R Wolfe, C Allman, G Hutchins, M Schwaiger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have demonstrated the clinical use of rubidium-82 chloride (Rb-82) in combination with positron emission tomography (PET) not only as a tracer of myocardial blood flow but also as a marker of cell membrane integrity using static imaging early and late after tracer injection. The purpose of this study was to compare myocardial Rb-82 kinetics assessed by dynamic PET imaging as a marker for tissue viability with regional fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease and 5 subjects with a low likelihood for coronary artery disease underwent dynamic PET imaging under resting conditions using Rb-82 and FDG. Both image sequences served as input data for a semiautomated regional analysis program. This program generated polar maps representing Rb-82 tissue half-life and FDG utilization assessed by Patlak's approach. Myocardial tissue viability was visually determined from static Rb-82 and FDG images. Regions were categorized as normal, ischemically compromised, and scar tissue. Their coordinates were subsequently copied to the functional polar maps for further analyses. In normal subjects, Rb-82 tissue half-life was homogeneous throughout the left ventricle (90 +/- 11 seconds). In coronary patients, differences between Rb-82 tissue half-lives in normal and scar tissue were highly significant (95 +/- 10 and 57 +/- 15 seconds, respectively; P < .0001). FDG uptake in these two tissue groups was 78 +/- 12% and 40 +/- 13%, respectively (P < .0001). Ischemically compromised tissue with reduced perfusion but maintained FDG uptake displayed an Rb-82 half-life of 75 +/- 9 seconds, indicating active cellular tracer retention, which was significantly different from scar tissue. Overall agreement of tissue categorization as either viable or scar was 86% between Rb-82 kinetics and FDG utilization. In a subgroup of 11 patients with all three tissue types within one image set, Rb-82 tissue half-life discriminated between normal, ischemic, and scar tissue (97 +/- 9, 75 +/- 9, and 60 +/- 15 seconds, respectively; P < .01).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a significant relationship between cell membrane integrity as assessed by dynamic Rb-82 PET imaging and myocardial glucose utilization as a marker for tissue viability. In regions with reduced perfusion, Rb-82 kinetics was different in compromised but metabolically active and irreversibly injured myocardium. The predictive value of this approach must be evaluated in follow-up studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8548894     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.93.2.238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  13 in total

1.  Novel F-18-labeled PET myocardial perfusion tracers: bench to bedside.

Authors:  Stephan G Nekolla; Antti Saraste
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  The utility of 82Rb PET for myocardial viability assessment: Comparison with perfusion-metabolism 82Rb-18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Jonathan B Moody; Keri M Hiller; Benjamin C Lee; Alexis Poitrasson-Rivière; James R Corbett; Richard L Weinberg; Venkatesh L Murthy; Edward P Ficaro
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Myocardial viability: seeking relevance and redefinition.

Authors:  J A Arrighi; R Soufer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Washout of ⁸²Rb as a marker of impaired tissue integrity, obtained by list-mode cardiac PET/CT: relationship with perfusion/metabolism patterns of myocardial viability.

Authors:  David T Chien; Paco Bravo; Takahiro Higuchi; Jennifer Merrill; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Quantitative 82Rb dynamic pet perfusion analysis with kinetic modeling for myocardial viability: Can we get away with just 82Rb perfusion kinetics?

Authors:  Karthik Ananthasubramaniam; Parthiban Arumugam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Time-frame sampling for 82Rb PET flow quantification: Towards standardization of clinical protocols.

Authors:  Ran Klein; Adrian Ocneanu; Robert A deKemp
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  [Examination of myocardial perfusion with positron emission tomography: a clinically useful and valid method?].

Authors:  J vom Dahl
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  Cardiac PET perfusion: prognosis, risk stratification, and clinical management.

Authors:  Sharmila Dorbala; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.446

9.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging.

Authors:  Mireille Lortie; Rob S B Beanlands; Keiichiro Yoshinaga; Ran Klein; Jean N Dasilva; Robert A DeKemp
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Reproducibility and accuracy of quantitative myocardial blood flow assessment with (82)Rb PET: comparison with (13)N-ammonia PET.

Authors:  Georges El Fakhri; Arash Kardan; Arkadiusz Sitek; Sharmila Dorbala; Nathalie Abi-Hatem; Youmna Lahoud; Alan Fischman; Martha Coughlan; Tsunehiro Yasuda; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.