Literature DB >> 17617332

Nutritional status affects the rate of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: a multivariate analysis of 132 patients.

Marek Sierzega1, Bogdan Niekowal, Jan Kulig, Tadeusz Popiela.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although malnutrition was found to increase the risk of intraabdominal and systemic complications in surgical patients, data for distal pancreatic resections are scarce. STUDY
DESIGN: Data on 132 consecutive patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy as the primary procedure for pancreatic pathology, between 1996 and 2005, were reviewed to identify risk factors for postoperative complications and determine the impact of nutritional status. Nutritional assessment was performed with clinical and laboratory variables, including unintentional weight loss, body mass index, blood albumin level, lymphocyte count, and Nutritional Risk Index (NRI) and Instant Nutritional Assessment (INA) scores.
RESULTS: Seventy-five (56.8%) patients developed 1 or more complications, including 18 (13.6%) cases of pancreatic fistula. The median values of NRI were significantly lower in patients with pancreatic fistula (96.9; 95% CI, 89.8 to 101.0) compared with those in the remaining subjects (102.5; 95% CI, 101.5 to 105.5; p=0.014). In the univariate analysis, the incidence of malnutrition defined by NRI (61% versus 30%, p=0.019) and the Instant Nutritional Assessment (67% versus 34%, p=0.017) was significantly higher in patients who developed pancreatic fistula. In the multivariate analysis, malnutrition characterized as NRI of 100 or less was the only factor that significantly increased the risk of pancreatic fistula, with an odds ratio of 8.12 (95% CI, 1.06 to 22.30).
CONCLUSIONS: Malnutrition, as defined by composite nutritional assessment scales consisting of clinical and laboratory parameters, is a major risk factor for pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17617332     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  31 in total

1.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open middle pancreatectomy: short-term results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shi Chen; Qian Zhan; Jia-Bin Jin; Zhi-Chong Wu; Yuan Shi; Dong-Feng Cheng; Hao Chen; Xia-Xing Deng; Bai-Yong Shen; Cheng-Hong Peng; Hong-Wei Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Short-term perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Emmanuel I Benizri; Adeline Germain; Ahmet Ayav; Jean-Louis Bernard; Rasa Zarnegar; Daniel Benchimol; Laurent Bresler; Laurent Brunaud
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-11-23

3.  Defining treatment and outcomes of hepaticojejunostomy failure following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Richard A Burkhart; Daniel Relles; Danielle M Pineda; Salil Gabale; Patricia K Sauter; Ernest L Rosato; Leonidas G Koniaris; Harish Lavu; Eugene P Kennedy; Charles J Yeo; Jordan M Winter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Risk factors for clinical pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: analysis of consecutive 100 patients.

Authors:  Ryuji Yoshioka; Akio Saiura; Rintaro Koga; Makoto Seki; Yoji Kishi; Ryo Morimura; Junji Yamamoto; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Can the physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) scoring system predict operative morbidity after distal pancreatectomy?

Authors:  Daisuke Hashimoto; Hiroshi Takamori; Yasuo Sakamoto; Hiroshi Tanaka; Masahiko Hirota; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Malnutrition, frailty, and sarcopenia in pancreatic cancer patients: assessments and interventions for the pancreatic surgeon.

Authors:  Noah S Rozich; Caitlin E Jones; Katherine T Morris
Journal:  Ann Pancreat Cancer       Date:  2019-03-11

7.  Risk stratification for distal pancreatectomy utilizing ACS-NSQIP: preoperative factors predict morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Kaitlyn Jane Kelly; David Yu Greenblatt; Yin Wan; Robert J Rettammel; Emily Winslow; Clifford S Cho; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  How do we predict the clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy?--an analysis in 244 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Masaji Tani; Seiko Hirono; Shinomi Ina; Motoki Miyazawa; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Pancreatic fistula rates after 462 distal pancreatectomies: staplers do not decrease fistula rates.

Authors:  Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; David W Rattner; David Berger; Hui Zheng; Bhupendra Rawal; Ruben Rodriguez; Sarah P Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.