Literature DB >> 27402095

Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open middle pancreatectomy: short-term results of a randomized controlled trial.

Shi Chen1,2, Qian Zhan1,3, Jia-Bin Jin1,3, Zhi-Chong Wu1,3, Yuan Shi1,3, Dong-Feng Cheng1,3, Hao Chen1,3, Xia-Xing Deng1,3, Bai-Yong Shen4,5, Cheng-Hong Peng6,7, Hong-Wei Li1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This first prospective randomized controlled trial was performed to compare short-term outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic middle pancreatectomy (RA-MP) with open middle pancreatectomy (OMP).
BACKGROUND: RA-MP is a novel minimally invasive surgical technique for benign or borderline tumors in the pancreatic neck or body. Its short-term effectiveness and safety remain unknown, compared to OMP.
METHODS: Patients eligible for MP from August 2011 to November 2015 were randomized into the RA-MP or OMP group. The primary endpoint was length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary endpoints were intraoperative parameters, and postoperative and recovery variables.
RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included into the study to analyze primary and secondary endpoints. Demographic characteristics and pathological parameters were similar in both groups. Furthermore, LOS was significantly shorter (15.6 vs. 21.7 days, P = 0.002), median operative time was reduced (160 vs. 193 min, P = 0.002), median blood loss was lower (50 vs. 200 mL, P < 0.001), rate of clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was lower (18 vs. 36.0 %, P = 0.043), nutritional status recovery was better, off-bed return to activity was expedited (3.1 vs. 4.6 days, P < 0.001), and resumption of bowel movement was faster (3.5 vs. 5.0 days, P < 0.001) in the RA-MP group, compared to the OMP group.
CONCLUSION: RA-MP was associated with significantly shorter LOS, reduced operative time, blood loss and clinical POPF rate, and expedited postoperative recovery, compared to OMP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Length of hospital stay; Middle pancreatectomy; Postoperative pancreatic fistula; Randomized; Robot-assisted laparoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27402095     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5046-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  29 in total

1.  Medial pancreatectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study of 53 patients by the French Pancreas Club.

Authors:  Alain Sauvanet; Christian Partensky; Bernard Sastre; Jean-François Gigot; Pierre-Louis Fagniez; Jean-Jacques Tuech; Bertrand Millat; Stéphane Berdah; Bertrand Dousset; Daniel Jaeck; Yves-Patrice Le Treut; Christian Letoublon
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery.

Authors:  Ning-xin Zhou; Jun-zhou Chen; Quanda Liu; Xiaodong Zhang; Zhifei Wang; Shiyan Ren; Xiong-fei Chen
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 2.547

3.  Matched Case-Control Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Pylorus-preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients With Periampullary Tumors.

Authors:  Ki Byung Song; Song Cheol Kim; Dae Wook Hwang; Jae Hoon Lee; Dong Joo Lee; Jung Woo Lee; Kwang-Min Park; Young-Joo Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Pure laparoscopic middle pancreatectomy: single-center experience with 13 cases.

Authors:  Safi Dokmak; Béatrice Aussilhou; Fadhel Samir Ftériche; Philippe Levy; Philippe Ruszniewski; Jacques Belghiti; Alain Sauvanet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Initial experiences using robot-assisted central pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy: a potential way to advanced laparoscopic pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Chang Moo Kang; Dong Hyun Kim; Woo Jung Lee; Hoon Sang Chi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Parenchyma-sparing pancreatectomies for benign or border-line tumors of the pancreas.

Authors:  Cosimo Sperti; Valentina Beltrame; Anna Caterina Milanetto; Margherita Moro; Sergio Pedrazzoli
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2010-06-15

7.  Robotic approach improves spleen-preserving rate and shortens postoperative hospital stay of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Shi Chen; Qian Zhan; Jiang-zhi Chen; Jia-bin Jin; Xia-xing Deng; Hao Chen; Bai-yong Shen; Cheng-hong Peng; Hong-wei Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial.

Authors:  Markus K Diener; Christoph M Seiler; Inga Rossion; Jörg Kleeff; Matthias Glanemann; Giovanni Butturini; Ales Tomazic; Christiane J Bruns; Olivier R C Busch; Stefan Farkas; Orlin Belyaev; John P Neoptolemos; Christopher Halloran; Tobias Keck; Marco Niedergethmann; Klaus Gellert; Helmut Witzigmann; Otto Kollmar; Peter Langer; Ulrich Steger; Jens Neudecker; Frederik Berrevoet; Silke Ganzera; Markus M Heiss; Steffen P Luntz; Thomas Bruckner; Meinhard Kieser; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Totally laparoscopic Roux-en-Y duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy after middle pancreatectomy: a consecutive nine-case series at a single institution.

Authors:  Fernando Rotellar; Fernando Pardo; Custodia Montiel; Alberto Benito; Fernando M Regueira; Ignacio Poveda; Pablo Martí-Cruchaga; Javier A Cienfuegos
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Initial experiences in robot-assisted middle pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Kun Cheng; Baiyong Shen; Chenghong Peng; Xiaxing Deng; Shudong Hu
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.647

View more
  5 in total

1.  The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Paper on the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  James R Howe; Nipun B Merchant; Claudius Conrad; Xavier M Keutgen; Julie Hallet; Jeffrey A Drebin; Rebecca M Minter; Terry C Lairmore; Jennifer F Tseng; Herbert J Zeh; Steven K Libutti; Gagandeep Singh; Jeffrey E Lee; Thomas A Hope; Michelle K Kim; Yusuf Menda; Thorvardur R Halfdanarson; Jennifer A Chan; Rodney F Pommier
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 2.  International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Go Wakabayashi; Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Allan Tsung; Kehu Yang; Brian K P Goh; Charing Ching-Ning Chong; Chang Moo Kang; Chenghong Peng; Eli Kakiashvili; Ho-Seong Han; Hong-Jin Kim; Jin He; Jae Hoon Lee; Kyoichi Takaori; Marco Vito Marino; Shen-Nien Wang; Tiankang Guo; Thilo Hackert; Ting-Shuo Huang; Yiengpruksawan Anusak; Yuman Fong; Yuichi Nagakawa; Yi-Ming Shyr; Yao-Ming Wu; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  A single institution experience with robotic and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies.

Authors:  Shi Qing Lee; Tousif Kabir; Ye-Xin Koh; Jin-Yao Teo; Ser-Yee Lee; Juinn-Huar Kam; Peng-Chung Cheow; Prema Raj Jeyaraj; Pierce K H Chow; London L Ooi; Alexander Y F Chung; Chung-Yip Chan; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2020-08-31

Review 4.  Robotic pancreas surgery: an overview of history and update on technique, outcomes, and financials.

Authors:  Hussein H Khachfe; Joseph R Habib; Salem Al Harthi; Amal Suhool; Ali H Hallal; Faek R Jamali
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-08-06

5.  Robotic-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Yuanchi Weng; Mengmin Chen; Georgios Gemenetzis; Yusheng Shi; Xiayang Ying; Xiaxing Deng; Chenghong Peng; Jiabin Jin; Baiyong Shen
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.