Literature DB >> 17611267

Noninformative vision causes adaptive changes in tactile sensitivity.

Justin A Harris1, Ehsan Arabzadeh, Clinton A Moore, Colin W G Clifford.   

Abstract

The last few years have witnessed a rapid growth of research investigating how information is integrated across sensory modalities, a process at the core of our everyday perceptual experiences. The present study focuses on the integration of vision and touch and, in particular, how tactile perception is affected by a view of the relevant body part containing no information about the tactile stimulus itself. Previous studies have established that this "noninformative vision" can improve subsequent tactile discrimination (Kennett et al., 2001; Taylor-Clarke et al., 2004a), a finding we confirm in the present study. However, we also report here that noninformative vision impairs the detection of tactile stimuli and the discrimination of near-threshold stimuli. These effects are shown to resemble, and indeed combine additively with, shifts in discrimination and detection thresholds produced by adaptation to suprathreshold tactile stimulation. We conclude that noninformative vision of the body does not simply enhance somatosensory processing, but rather it induces adaptive changes in tactile sensitivity via shifts in gain control operating within a bimodal sensory system. This constitutes a novel means by which vision of the body can alter tactile perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17611267      PMCID: PMC6794580          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2102-07.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  23 in total

1.  Subjective image of invisible hand coded by monkey intraparietal neurons.

Authors:  S Obayashi; M Tanaka; A Iriki
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-11-09       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Perceptual adaptation: motion parallels orientation.

Authors:  Colin W.G. Clifford
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements.

Authors:  R H LaMotte; V B Mountcastle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Tactile perception, cortical representation and the bodily self.

Authors:  Patrick Haggard; Marisa Taylor-Clarke; Steffan Kennett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Reference frames for representing visual and tactile locations in parietal cortex.

Authors:  Marie Avillac; Sophie Denève; Etienne Olivier; Alexandre Pouget; Jean-René Duhamel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Viewing the body prepares the brain for touch: effects of TMS over somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Mirta Fiorio; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

8.  Human vibrotactile frequency discriminative capacity after adaptation to 25 Hz or 200 Hz stimulation.

Authors:  M Tommerdahl; K D Hester; E R Felix; M Hollins; O V Favorov; P M Quibrera; B L Whitsel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Persistence of visual-tactile enhancement in humans.

Authors:  Marisa Taylor-Clarke; Steffan Kennett; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  18 in total

1.  The role of the right temporoparietal junction in intersensory conflict: detection or resolution?

Authors:  Liuba Papeo; Matthew R Longo; Matteo Feurra; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multisensory distortions of the hand have differential effects on tactile perception.

Authors:  A Treshi-marie Perera; Roger Newport; Kirsten J McKenzie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual presentation of hand image modulates visuo-tactile temporal order judgment.

Authors:  Masakazu Ide; Souta Hidaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Seeing the body produces limb-specific modulation of skin temperature.

Authors:  Renata Sadibolova; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Cortical responses to the mirror box illusion: a high-resolution EEG study.

Authors:  Line Lindhardt Egsgaard; Laura Petrini; Giselle Christoffersen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Vision of the body increases interference on the somatic signal detection task.

Authors:  Laura Mirams; Ellen Poliakoff; Richard J Brown; Donna M Lloyd
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Observation of own exploration movements impairs haptic spatial perception.

Authors:  Stephanie Mueller; Stefanie Habermann; Janett Dudda; Martin Grunwald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Tactile localization biases are modulated by gaze direction.

Authors:  Sonia Medina; Luigi Tamè; Matthew R Longo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Neural mechanisms underlying touch-induced visual perceptual suppression: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Masakazu Ide; Souta Hidaka; Hanako Ikeda; Makoto Wada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  How Visual Body Perception Influences Somatosensory Plasticity.

Authors:  Esther Kuehn; Burkhard Pleger
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.