Literature DB >> 26195170

Multisensory distortions of the hand have differential effects on tactile perception.

A Treshi-marie Perera1, Roger Newport2, Kirsten J McKenzie3,4.   

Abstract

Research has suggested that altering the perceived shape and size of the body image significantly affects perception of somatic events. The current study investigated how multisensory illusions applied to the body altered tactile perception using the somatic signal detection task. Thirty-one healthy volunteers were asked to report the presence or absence of near-threshold tactile stimuli delivered to the index finger under three multisensory illusion conditions: stretched finger, shrunken finger and detached finger, as well as a veridical baseline condition. Both stretching and shrinking the stimulated finger enhanced correct touch detections; however, the mechanisms underlying this increase were found to be different. In contrast, the detached appearance reduced false touch reports-possibly due to reduced tactile noise, as a result of attention being directed to the tip of the finger only. These findings suggest that distorted representations of the body could have different modulatory effects on attention to touch and provide a link between perceived body representation and somatosensory decision-making.

Keywords:  MIRAGE; Multisensory illusions; Signal detection; Somatic signal detection task; Tactile perception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26195170     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4384-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  49 in total

1.  Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation.

Authors:  Clare Press; Marisa Taylor-Clarke; Steffan Kennett; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Size reduction using Mirror Visual Feedback (MVF) reduces phantom pain.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; David Brang; Paul D McGeoch
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 0.881

3.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Lateralized sensitivity to vibrotactile stimulation: individual differences revealed by interaction of threshold and signal detection tasks.

Authors:  D L Rhodes; G E Schwartz
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Vision of the body increases interference on the somatic signal detection task.

Authors:  Laura Mirams; Ellen Poliakoff; Richard J Brown; Donna M Lloyd
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Role of norepinephrine in the pathophysiology and treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  S M Southwick; J D Bremner; A Rasmusson; C A Morgan; A Arnsten; D S Charney
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Mere observation of body discontinuity affects perceived ownership and vicarious agency over a virtual hand.

Authors:  G Tieri; E Tidoni; E F Pavone; S M Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The amplification of somatic symptoms.

Authors:  A J Barsky; J D Goodson; R S Lane; P D Cleary
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

9.  The good-subject effect: investigating participant demand characteristics.

Authors:  Austin Lee Nichols; Jon K Maner
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  2008-04

10.  Is my hand connected to my body? The impact of body continuity and arm alignment on the virtual hand illusion.

Authors:  Daniel Perez-Marcos; Maria V Sanchez-Vives; Mel Slater
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  5 in total

1.  Simultaneous acoustic stimulation of human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices using transcranial focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Wonhye Lee; Yong An Chung; Yujin Jung; In-Uk Song; Seung-Schik Yoo
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.288

2.  The structural and functional connectivity neural underpinnings of body image.

Authors:  Massieh Moayedi; Nasim Noroozbahari; Georgia Hadjis; Kristy Themelis; Tim V Salomons; Roger Newport; Jennifer S Lewis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Body visual discontinuity affects feeling of ownership and skin conductance responses.

Authors:  Gaetano Tieri; Emmanuele Tidoni; Enea Francesco Pavone; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Tool-use: An open window into body representation and its plasticity.

Authors:  Marie Martel; Lucilla Cardinali; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Non-informative vision improves spatial tactile discrimination on the shoulder but does not influence detection sensitivity.

Authors:  Fabrizio Leo; Sara Nataletti; Luca Brayda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.