Literature DB >> 20186403

Vision of the body increases interference on the somatic signal detection task.

Laura Mirams1, Ellen Poliakoff, Richard J Brown, Donna M Lloyd.   

Abstract

Research suggests that attention has a significant effect on somatic perception in both healthy people and those who suffer from somatic disturbance. The current study investigates the effects of attending to the body on somatic awareness and a particular type of somatic disturbance: erroneous reports of touch sensation, as measured by the Somatic Signal Detection Task (SSDT). During the SSDT, participants are required to detect near-threshold tactile stimulation at their fingertip. Previous research has found that healthy participants erroneously report touch sensations in the absence of a stimulus on this task and that such false alarms are increased when a simultaneous light flash is presented next to their fingertip. Thirty-seven participants completed the SSDT under two conditions: non-informative vision of the hand and no vision of the hand. False alarms were significantly higher in light trials in the non-informative vision condition compared to light trials in the no-vision condition. However, hit rates, sensitivity (d') and response criterion (c) were not affected by non-informative vision of the hand. Using the SSDT, we found that viewing the body increased somatic interference, possibly due to raised awareness of internal bodily sensations. This work provides evidence that viewing the body can have a detrimental effect on simple detection of near-threshold tactile stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20186403     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2185-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  Visuo-tactile cross-modal associations in cortical somatosensory cells.

Authors:  Y D Zhou; J M Fuster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation.

Authors:  Clare Press; Marisa Taylor-Clarke; Steffan Kennett; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Multisensory representation of limb position in human premotor cortex.

Authors:  Donna M Lloyd; David I Shore; Charles Spence; Gemma A Calvert
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Seeing or not seeing where your hands are.

Authors:  E Làdavas; A Farnè; G Zeloni; G di Pellegrino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

7.  The influence of self-focused attention on heartbeat perception.

Authors:  J Weisz; L Balázs; G Adám
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Coding of visual space by premotor neurons.

Authors:  M S Graziano; G S Yap; C G Gross
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; C Scandolara; M Matelli; M Gentilucci
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Neuropsychological evidence of an integrated visuotactile representation of peripersonal space in humans.

Authors:  E Làdavas; G di Pellegrino; A Farnè; G Zeloni
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  15 in total

1.  Interacting effects of vision and attention in perceiving spontaneous sensations arising on the hands.

Authors:  George A Michael; Marie-Agnès Dupuy; Amélie Deleuze; Margaux Humblot; Bilitys Simon; Janick Naveteur
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Multisensory distortions of the hand have differential effects on tactile perception.

Authors:  A Treshi-marie Perera; Roger Newport; Kirsten J McKenzie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Managing Medically Unexplained Symptoms in Primary Care: A Narrative Review and Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Sam Hubley; Lisa Uebelacker; Charles Eaton
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2014-07-02

4.  The visual and haptic contributions to hand perception.

Authors:  Lara A Coelho; Claudia Lr Gonzalez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-05-13

5.  Visual presentation of hand image modulates visuo-tactile temporal order judgment.

Authors:  Masakazu Ide; Souta Hidaka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Multisensory interactions between vestibular, visual and somatosensory signals.

Authors:  Elisa Raffaella Ferrè; Leif Erik Walther; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Vision affects tactile target and distractor processing even when space is task-irrelevant.

Authors:  Ann-Katrin Wesslein; Charles Spence; Christian Frings
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-06

8.  Tactile stimulation can suppress visual perception.

Authors:  Masakazu Ide; Souta Hidaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Quantifying the sensory and emotional perception of touch: differences between glabrous and hairy skin.

Authors:  Rochelle Ackerley; Karin Saar; Francis McGlone; Helena Backlund Wasling
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  The tactile detection threshold changes when a visual stimulus is presented with a short temporal gap.

Authors:  Yumi Ju
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-01-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.