Literature DB >> 27807378

Glove perforation rate with orthopedic gloving versus double gloving technique in tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: A randomized trial.

Kimberly Egeler1, Nicole Stephenson1, Natasha Stanke1.   

Abstract

In this randomized, prospective study, perforation rates, glove change rates, and cost between orthopedic gloves (n = 227) and double gloving with standard latex surgical gloves (n = 178) worn in tibial plateau leveling osteotomy procedures were compared. Gloves were collected from the surgeon and surgical resident after procedures and were tested for perforations with a standardized water leak test, as described by the American Society for Testing and Materials International. No statistically significant difference was found between the perforation rate using orthopedic gloving and double gloving techniques (P = 0.629) or the rate at which gloves were changed (P = 0.146). Orthopedic gloving was 2.1 times more costly than double gloving but they may be preferred by surgeons for dexterity and comfort.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27807378      PMCID: PMC5081145     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Vet J        ISSN: 0008-5286            Impact factor:   1.008


  10 in total

1.  Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.

Authors:  S Thomas; M Agarwal; G Mehta
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Postoperative integrity of veterinary surgical gloves.

Authors:  Ben J Character; Ron M McLaughlin; Cheryl S Hedlund; Carolyn R Boyle; Steven H Elder
Journal:  J Am Anim Hosp Assoc       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.023

3.  Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery.

Authors:  Yue Ping Guo; Po Ming Wong; Yi Li; Peggy Pui Lai Or
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Caroline Hampton Halsted: the first to use rubber gloves in the operating room.

Authors:  S Robert Lathan
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2010-10

5.  The rate of glove perforations in orthopaedic procedures: single versus double gloving. A prospective study.

Authors:  K Y Chan; V A Singh; B H Oun; B H Se To
Journal:  Med J Malaysia       Date:  2006-12

6.  Surgical glove perforation and the risk of surgical site infection.

Authors:  Heidi Misteli; Walter P Weber; Stefan Reck; Rachel Rosenthal; Marcel Zwahlen; Philipp Fueglistaler; Martin K Bolli; Daniel Oertli; Andreas F Widmer; Walter R Marti
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-06

7.  Concentration of bacteria passing through puncture holes in surgical gloves.

Authors:  Julian-Camill Harnoss; Lars-Ivo Partecke; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Nils-Olaf Hübner; Axel Kramer; Ojan Assadian
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Perforation rate using a single pair of orthopedic gloves vs. a double pair of gloves in obstetric cases.

Authors:  M A Turnquest; H Y How; S A Allen; D H Voss; J A Spinnato
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Med       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec

9.  Investigation of incidence and risk factors for surgical glove perforation in small animal surgery.

Authors:  Galina M Hayes; Deborah Reynolds; Noel M M Moens; Ameet Singh; Michelle Oblak; Thomas W G Gibson; Brigitte A Brisson; Alim Nazarali; Cate Dewey
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 1.495

10.  Bacterial migration through punctured surgical gloves under real surgical conditions.

Authors:  Nils-Olaf Hübner; Anna-Maria Goerdt; Natalie Stanislawski; Ojan Assadian; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Axel Kramer; Lars Ivo Partecke
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.090

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.