Literature DB >> 17600147

Local quality assessment in homology models using statistical potentials and support vector machines.

Marc Fasnacht1, Jiang Zhu, Barry Honig.   

Abstract

In this study, we address the problem of local quality assessment in homology models. As a prerequisite for the evaluation of methods for predicting local model quality, we first examine the problem of measuring local structural similarities between a model and the corresponding native structure. Several local geometric similarity measures are evaluated. Two methods based on structural superposition are found to best reproduce local model quality assessments by human experts. We then examine the performance of state-of-the-art statistical potentials in predicting local model quality on three qualitatively distinct data sets. The best statistical potential, DFIRE, is shown to perform on par with the best current structure-based method in the literature, ProQres. A combination of different statistical potentials and structural features using support vector machines is shown to provide somewhat improved performance over published methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17600147      PMCID: PMC2203356          DOI: 10.1110/ps.072856307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  51 in total

1.  ProVal: a protein-scoring function for the selection of native and near-native folds.

Authors:  Anders Berglund; Richard D Head; Eric A Welsh; Garland R Marshall
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-02-01

2.  Using multiple structure alignments, fast model building, and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling.

Authors:  Donald Petrey; Zhexin Xiang; Christopher L Tang; Lei Xie; Marina Gimpelev; Therese Mitros; Cinque S Soto; Sharon Goldsmith-Fischman; Andrew Kernytsky; Avner Schlessinger; Ingrid Y Y Koh; Emil Alexov; Barry Honig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003

3.  Single-body residue-level knowledge-based energy score combined with sequence-profile and secondary structure information for fold recognition.

Authors:  Hongyi Zhou; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-06-01

4.  Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles.

Authors:  R Lüthy; J U Bowie; D Eisenberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Distinguish protein decoys by using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model.

Authors:  Mathew C Lee; Yong Duan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-15

Review 6.  Knowledge-based potentials for proteins.

Authors:  M J Sippl
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints.

Authors:  A Sali; T L Blundell
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-12-05       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins.

Authors:  M J Sippl
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1993-12

10.  Verification of protein structures: patterns of nonbonded atomic interactions.

Authors:  C Colovos; T O Yeates
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.725

View more
  14 in total

1.  VITAL NMR: using chemical shift derived secondary structure information for a limited set of amino acids to assess homology model accuracy.

Authors:  Michael C Brothers; Anna E Nesbitt; Michael J Hallock; Sanjeewa G Rupasinghe; Ming Tang; Jason Harris; Jerome Baudry; Mary A Schuler; Chad M Rienstra
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Protein structure homology modeling using SWISS-MODEL workspace.

Authors:  Lorenza Bordoli; Florian Kiefer; Konstantin Arnold; Pascal Benkert; James Battey; Torsten Schwede
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  Template-based protein structure modeling.

Authors:  Andras Fiser
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

4.  Quality assessment of protein model-structures using evolutionary conservation.

Authors:  Matan Kalman; Nir Ben-Tal
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Template-based protein modeling: recent methodological advances.

Authors:  Pankaj R Daga; Ronak Y Patel; Robert J Doerksen
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Refining homology models by combining replica-exchange molecular dynamics and statistical potentials.

Authors:  Jiang Zhu; Hao Fan; Xavier Periole; Barry Honig; Alan E Mark
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2008-09

Review 7.  Protein structure prediction and model quality assessment.

Authors:  Andriy Kryshtafovych; Krzysztof Fidelis
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 8.  Molecular modeling and ligand docking for solute carrier (SLC) transporters.

Authors:  Avner Schlessinger; Natalia Khuri; Kathleen M Giacomini; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Using neural networks and evolutionary information in decoy discrimination for protein tertiary structure prediction.

Authors:  Ching-Wai Tan; David T Jones
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information.

Authors:  Pascal Benkert; Torsten Schwede; Silvio Ce Tosatto
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2009-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.