Literature DB >> 18267018

Using neural networks and evolutionary information in decoy discrimination for protein tertiary structure prediction.

Ching-Wai Tan1, David T Jones.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We present a novel method of protein fold decoy discrimination using machine learning, more specifically using neural networks. Here, decoy discrimination is represented as a machine learning problem, where neural networks are used to learn the native-like features of protein structures using a set of positive and negative training examples. A set of native protein structures provides the positive training examples, while negative training examples are simulated decoy structures obtained by reversing the sequences of native structures. Various features are extracted from the training dataset of positive and negative examples and used as inputs to the neural networks.
RESULTS: Results have shown that the best performing neural network is the one that uses input information comprising of PSI-BLAST 1 profiles of residue pairs, pairwise distance and the relative solvent accessibilities of the residues. This neural network is the best among all methods tested in discriminating the native structure from a set of decoys for all decoy datasets tested.
CONCLUSION: This method is demonstrated to be viable, and furthermore evolutionary information is successfully used in the neural networks to improve decoy discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18267018      PMCID: PMC2267779          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-94

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  33 in total

1.  Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction.

Authors:  R Samudrala; M Levitt
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Ab initio construction of protein tertiary structures using a hierarchical approach.

Authors:  Y Xia; E S Huang; M Levitt; R Samudrala
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06-30       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)--round 6.

Authors:  John Moult; Krzysztof Fidelis; Burkhard Rost; Tim Hubbard; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005

4.  Pcons5: combining consensus, structural evaluation and fold recognition scores.

Authors:  Björn Wallner; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  The victor/FRST function for model quality estimation.

Authors:  Silvio C E Tosatto
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  A composite score for predicting errors in protein structure models.

Authors:  David Eramian; Min-yi Shen; Damien Devos; Francisco Melo; Andrej Sali; Marc A Marti-Renom
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Benchmarking template selection and model quality assessment for high-resolution comparative modeling.

Authors:  M I Sadowski; D T Jones
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2007-11-15

8.  Local quality assessment in homology models using statistical potentials and support vector machines.

Authors:  Marc Fasnacht; Jiang Zhu; Barry Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at the profile level.

Authors:  Qiwen Dong; Xiaolong Wang; Lei Lin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins.

Authors:  Markus Wiederstein; Manfred J Sippl
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  JPred4: a protein secondary structure prediction server.

Authors:  Alexey Drozdetskiy; Christian Cole; James Procter; Geoffrey J Barton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Identify High-Quality Protein Structural Models by Enhanced K-Means.

Authors:  Hongjie Wu; Haiou Li; Min Jiang; Cheng Chen; Qiang Lv; Chuang Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.