Literature DB >> 17598167

Correlation between motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Choi Deblieck1, Benjamin Thompson, Marco Iacoboni, Allan D Wu.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has become a common tool for the brain mapping of a wide variety of cognitive functions. Because TMS over cortical regions of interest other than motor cortex often does not produce easily observable effects, the ability to calibrate TMS intensity for stimulation over nonmotor regions can be problematic. Previous studies reported no correlation between motor thresholds (MT) over the motor cortex and phosphene thresholds (PT) over the visual cortex. However, different thresholding methods, lighting, and eye-closure conditions were used to determine MT and PT. We investigated the correlation between resting MT (rMT), active MT (aMT), and PT in 27 dark-adapted healthy volunteers. All thresholds were measured with eyes-open in the dark and determined by gradually reducing stimulation intensity downward. All subjects had aMT and rMT; 21 subjects had measurable PT. rMT was 70.4% +/- 9.8% (mean +/- SD of maximum stimulator output); aMT was 61.1% +/- 7.9%; PT was 82.2% +/- 10.1%. A significant positive correlation was found between aMT and PT (r = 0.53; P = 0.014) with a trend toward correlation between rMT and PT (r = 0.43; P = 0.052). Our results suggest that sensitivity to TMS over visual and motor cortices may be correlated under similar thresholding procedures. They also provide a rationale for the use of easily obtained aMT to calibrate TMS intensities in brain mapping studies that employ TMS in cortical regions besides motor cortex. Copyright 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17598167      PMCID: PMC6870884          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  56 in total

1.  Changes in visual cortex excitability in blind subjects as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Janna Gothe; Stephan A Brandt; Kerstin Irlbacher; Simone Röricht; Bernhard A Sabel; Bernd-Ulrich Meyer
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in studies of vision, attention and cognition.

Authors:  L Stewart; A Ellison; V Walsh; A Cowey
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2001-04

3.  Evaluation of cortical excitability by motor and phosphene thresholds in transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  M Gerwig; O Kastrup; B-U Meyer; L Niehaus
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.181

4.  Phosphene threshold as a function of contrast of external visual stimuli.

Authors:  Andreas M Rauschecker; Sven Bestmann; Vincent Walsh; Kai V Thilo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of lorazepam on the motor cortical excitability in man.

Authors:  U Ziemann; S Lönnecker; B J Steinhoff; W Paulus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Long-term potentiation and NMDA receptors in rat visual cortex.

Authors:  A Artola; W Singer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Dec 17-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Functional relevance of cross-modal plasticity in blind humans.

Authors:  L G Cohen; P Celnik; A Pascual-Leone; B Corwell; L Falz; J Dambrosia; M Honda; N Sadato; C Gerloff; M D Catalá; M Hallett
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Phosphenes induced by magnetic stimulation over the occipital brain: description and probable site of stimulation.

Authors:  E Marg; D Rudiak
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Excitability of human motor and visual cortex before, during, and after hyperventilation.

Authors:  Roland Sparing; Manuel Dafotakis; Dorothee Buelte; Ingo G Meister; Johannes Noth
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2006-09-21

10.  Mechanisms of use-dependent plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  C M Bütefisch; B C Davis; S P Wise; L Sawaki; L Kopylev; J Classen; L G Cohen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Parameterization of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Michael T Rubens; Theodore P Zanto
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Determination of motor threshold using visual observation overestimates transcranial magnetic stimulation dosage: safety implications.

Authors:  Gregory G Westin; Bruce D Bassi; Sarah H Lisanby; Bruce Luber
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  A double dissociation between striate and extrastriate visual cortex for pattern motion perception revealed using rTMS.

Authors:  Benjamin Thompson; Craig Aaen-Stockdale; Lisa Koski; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Interhemispheric transfer of phosphenes generated by occipital versus parietal transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Carlo A Marzi; Francesca Mancini; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  TMS applied to V1 can facilitate reasoning.

Authors:  Kai Hamburger; Marco Ragni; Harun Karimpur; Imke Franzmeier; Florian Wedell; Markus Knauff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Suppression of EEG visual-evoked potentials in rats through neuromodulatory focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Hyungmin Kim; Michael Y Park; Stephanie D Lee; Wonhye Lee; Alan Chiu; Seung-Schik Yoo
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Is selective primary visual cortex stimulation achievable with TMS?

Authors:  Niina Salminen-Vaparanta; Valdas Noreika; Antti Revonsuo; Mika Koivisto; Simo Vanni
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Biophysical determinants of transcranial magnetic stimulation: effects of excitability and depth of targeted area.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Anthony T Barker; Martynas Dervinis; Frederick Verbruggen; Leah Maizey; Rachel C Adams; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Psychophysical and rTMS Evidence for the Presence of Motion Opponency in Human V5.

Authors:  Benjamin Thompson; Choi Deblieck; Allan Wu; Marco Iacoboni; Zili Liu
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.