Literature DB >> 18663438

Interhemispheric transfer of phosphenes generated by occipital versus parietal transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Carlo A Marzi1, Francesca Mancini, Silvia Savazzi.   

Abstract

Phosphenes represent a perceptual effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or electric stimulation of visual cortical areas. One likely neural basis for the generation of static phosphenes is the primary visual cortex (V1) although evidence is controversial. A peculiar feature of V1 is that it has sparse callosal connections with the exception of a central portion of visual field representation. In contrast, visually responsive cortical areas in the parietal lobe have widespread callosal connections. Thus, interhemispheric transfer (IT) time of off-centre phosphenes should be slower when generated by V1 than by visual parietal areas. To verify this possibility, in Exp. 1 we measured IT of phosphenes generated by TMS applied to V1 and in Exp. 2 we measured IT of phosphenes obtained by TMS applied to posterior parietal cortex. In both experiments, we obtained static bright circular phosphenes appearing in the contralateral hemifield. We measured IT time behaviorally by comparing unimanual simple reaction time to the onset of a phosphene under crossed or uncrossed hemifield-hand condition (Poffenberger paradigm). In keeping with our prediction, we found a substantially longer IT time for V1 than for parietal phosphenes. Additionally, an IT similar to that obtained with V1 stimulation was found when participants were asked to imagine the phosphenes previously experienced during TMS. In conclusion, the present results suggest that IT of phosphenes either generated by V1 TMS or imagined is subserved by slower callosal channels than those of real visual stimuli or parietal phosphenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18663438     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1496-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  72 in total

1.  Hemispheric interactions in simple reaction time.

Authors:  Michael C Corballis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Visual and tactile interhemispheric transfer compared with the method of Poffenberger.

Authors:  Robert Fendrich; Jeffrey J Hutsler; Michael S Gazzaniga
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum.

Authors:  F Aboitiz; A B Scheibel; R S Fisher; E Zaidel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1992-12-11       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 4.  Visuo-motor integration and control in the human posterior parietal cortex: evidence from TMS and fMRI.

Authors:  Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: a comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies.

Authors:  Roland Sparing; Dorothee Buelte; Ingo G Meister; Tomás Paus; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Retinal eccentricity effects on reaction time to imagined stimuli.

Authors:  C A Marzi; F Mancini; T Metitieri; S Savazzi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Simple reaction times of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized visual stimuli.

Authors:  G Berlucchi; W Heron; R Hyman; G Rizzolatti; C Umiltà
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Contributions of the corpus callosum and the anterior commissure to visual activation of inferior temporal neurons.

Authors:  C G Gross; D B Bender; M Mishkin
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1977-08-12       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  Tickling the brain: studying visual sensation, perception and cognition by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  A Cowey; V Walsh
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.453

10.  Magnetic stimuli applied over motor and visual cortex: influence of coil position and field polarity on motor responses, phosphenes, and eye movements.

Authors:  B U Meyer; R Diehl; H Steinmetz; T C Britton; R Benecke
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1991
View more
  15 in total

1.  Assessing the effects of physical and perceived luminance contrast on RT and TMS-induced percepts.

Authors:  Ramisha Knight; Chiara Mazzi; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Electrophysiological correlates of short-latency afferent inhibition: a combined EEG and TMS study.

Authors:  Rozaliya Bikmullina; Dubravko Kicić; Synnöve Carlson; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Retinal and visual cortex distance from transcranial magnetic stimulation of the vertex affects phosphene perception.

Authors:  Kelly Webster; Tony Ro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Distinct Oscillatory Frequencies Underlie Excitability of Human Occipital and Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Jason Samaha; Olivia Gosseries; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Cell type-specific excitability probed by optogenetic stimulation depends on the phase of the alpha oscillation.

Authors:  Mengsen Zhang; Flavio Frohlich
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Phosphene-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation of occipital but not parietal cortex suppresses stimulus visibility.

Authors:  Evelina Tapia; Chiara Mazzi; Silvia Savazzi; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The neural signature of phosphene perception.

Authors:  Paul C J Taylor; Vincent Walsh; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The influence of posterior parietal cortex on extrastriate visual activity: A concurrent TMS and fast optical imaging study.

Authors:  Nathan A Parks; Chiara Mazzi; Evelina Tapia; Silvia Savazzi; Monica Fabiani; Gabriele Gratton; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Modulation of visual cortical excitability by working memory: effect of luminance contrast of mental imagery.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Alberto Pisoni; Costanza Papagno; Juha Silvanto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-02-25

10.  Characterization of visual percepts evoked by noninvasive stimulation of the human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Peter J Fried; Seth Elkin-Frankston; Richard Jarrett Rushmore; Claus C Hilgetag; Antoni Valero-Cabre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.