Literature DB >> 22072509

Parameterization of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Michael T Rubens1, Theodore P Zanto.   

Abstract

A recent study (Di Lazzaro et al. J Neurophysiol 105: 2150-2156, 2011) describes the findings from a rigorous comparison on the effects of several popular variations of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocols. The results demonstrate that excitatory and inhibitory neural networks may be independently modulated based on TMS protocol selection. Moreover, the within-group replication of multiple between-group experiments suggests that independent evaluations of TMS parameters will continue to inform and guide future TMS research.

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 22072509      PMCID： PMC3311692          DOI： 10.1152/jn.00716.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN： 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  15 in total

1.  The transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold depends on the distance from coil to underlying cortex: a replication in healthy adults comparing two methods of assessing the distance to cortex.

Authors:  K A McConnell; Z Nahas; A Shastri; J P Lorberbaum; F A Kozel; D E Bohning; M S George
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Interindividual variability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability.

Authors:  F Maeda; J P Keenan; J M Tormos; H Topka; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  How coil-cortex distance relates to age, motor threshold, and antidepressant response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  F A Kozel; Z Nahas; C deBrux; M Molloy; J P Lorberbaum; D Bohning; S C Risch; M S George
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.198

4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation elicits coupled neural and hemodynamic consequences.

Authors:  Elena A Allen; Brian N Pasley; Thang Duong; Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Correlation between motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Choi Deblieck; Benjamin Thompson; Marco Iacoboni; Allan D Wu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  R Chen; J Classen; C Gerloff; P Celnik; E M Wassermann; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  A temporally asymmetric Hebbian rule governing plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Wolters; Friedhelm Sandbrink; Antje Schlottmann; Erwin Kunesch; Katja Stefan; Leonardo G Cohen; Reiner Benecke; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-22       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The physiological basis of the effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; F Pilato; M Dileone; P Profice; A Oliviero; P Mazzone; A Insola; F Ranieri; M Meglio; P A Tonali; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  State-dependent variability of neuronal responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the visual cortex.

Authors:  Brian N Pasley; Elena A Allen; Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Combining TMS and fMRI: from 'virtual lesions' to functional-network accounts of cognition.

Authors:  Christian C Ruff; Jon Driver; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.027
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in healthy aging and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wan-Yu Hsu; Yixuan Ku; Theodore P Zanto; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 2.  Combinatorial approaches for treating neuropsychiatric social impairment.

Authors:  Don Wei; Sherab Tsheringla; James C McPartland; A Z A Stephen Azariah Allsop
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  Anticipatory alpha phase influences visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; James Z Chadick; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Clinical improvement in patients with borderline personality disorder after treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: preliminary results.

Authors:  Julian Reyes-López; Josefina Ricardo-Garcell; Gabriela Armas-Castañeda; María García-Anaya; Iván Arango-De Montis; Jorge J González-Olvera; Francisco Pellicer
Journal:  Braz J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.697

5.  The modulation effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognitive function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ying Xu; Zhijie Qiu; Jingfang Zhu; Jiao Liu; Jingsong Wu; Jing Tao; Lidian Chen
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.288

6.  Low-frequency parietal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces fear and anxiety.

Authors:  Nicholas L Balderston; Emily M Beydler; Madeline Goodwin; Zhi-De Deng; Thomas Radman; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Monique Ernst; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Mechanistic link between right prefrontal cortical activity and anxious arousal revealed using transcranial magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Nicholas L Balderston; Emily M Beydler; Camille Roberts; Zhi-De Deng; Thomas Radman; Tiffany Lago; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Monique Ernst; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 7.853
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.