Literature DB >> 14568132

Evaluation of cortical excitability by motor and phosphene thresholds in transcranial magnetic stimulation.

M Gerwig1, O Kastrup, B-U Meyer, L Niehaus.   

Abstract

Motor threshold (MT), as determined by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), is used as a parameter of cortex excitability. In TMS with single or repetitive pulses, stimulus intensities in general are referred to the individual MT, although it is unclear whether MT also reflects the excitability of nonmotor cortical areas such as the visual cortex. Visual cortex excitability can be assessed by thresholds for eliciting phosphenes (phosphene threshold, PT) following TMS over the occipital cortex. The question of a different efficacy of TMS pulses in distinct cortical areas was approached by comparing motor and phosphene thresholds using single-pulse TMS applied to the primary motor and visual cortex. The aim of the study was to clarify, whether MT and PT correlate with each other and whether MT possibly serves as a reasonable measure for the excitability of the visual cortex. In 32 healthy volunteers, TMS with biphasic single pulses was applied over the motor and visual cortex with a figure of eight-shaped coil connected to a Dantec MagPro stimulator. MT and PT were individually measured (percent of maximal stimulator output). Mean PT (61.4+/-11.7%) was significantly higher than mean MT (39.4+/-5.9%) (p=0.01). MT and PT did not correlate significantly (r=0.29, p>0.1). These findings suggest that the MT does not reflect the excitability of the visual cortex. Regarding excitatory effects, the efficacy of TMS may be different over the motor and visual cortex, likely related to a different excitability of these cortical areas. This should be considered in planning and execution of TMS studies of nonmotor cortical areas.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14568132     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-510x(03)00228-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  26 in total

1.  Determination of motor threshold using visual observation overestimates transcranial magnetic stimulation dosage: safety implications.

Authors:  Gregory G Westin; Bruce D Bassi; Sarah H Lisanby; Bruce Luber
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Prefrontal TMS produces smaller EEG responses than motor-cortex TMS: implications for rTMS treatment in depression.

Authors:  Seppo Kähkönen; Soile Komssi; Juha Wilenius; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Modulation of excitatory and inhibitory circuits for visual awareness in the human right parietal cortex.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch; Massimiliano Oliveri; Sara Torriero; Carlo Caltagirone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Modulation of phosphene perception during saccadic eye movements: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study of the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Chadwick Boulay; Tomás Paus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of repetitive TMS on visually evoked potentials and EEG in the anaesthetized cat: dependence on stimulus frequency and train duration.

Authors:  Selcen Aydin-Abidin; Vera Moliadze; Ulf T Eysel; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Correlation between motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Choi Deblieck; Benjamin Thompson; Marco Iacoboni; Allan D Wu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Maturation changes the excitability and effective connectivity of the frontal lobe: A developmental TMS-EEG study.

Authors:  Sara Määttä; Laura Säisänen; Elisa Kallioniemi; Timo A Lakka; Niina Lintu; Eero A Haapala; Päivi Koskenkorva; Eini Niskanen; Florinda Ferreri; Mervi Könönen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Biophysical determinants of transcranial magnetic stimulation: effects of excitability and depth of targeted area.

Authors:  Mark G Stokes; Anthony T Barker; Martynas Dervinis; Frederick Verbruggen; Leah Maizey; Rachel C Adams; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Effects of visual deprivation on primary motor cortex excitability: a study on healthy subjects based on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Chiara Cambieri; Elisa Iacovelli; Maria Cristina Gori; Emanuela Onesti; Marco Ceccanti; Vittorio Frasca; Maurizio Inghilleri
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Resting state morphology predicts the effect of theta burst stimulation in false belief reasoning.

Authors:  Charlotte E Hartwright; Robert M Hardwick; Ian A Apperly; Peter C Hansen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.