Literature DB >> 17595363

Comparison of point-of-care and laboratory glucose analysis in critically ill patients.

Teresita Lacara1, Caroline Domagtoy, Donna Lickliter, Kathy Quattrocchi, Lydia Snipes, Joánne Kuszaj, MaryClare Prasnikar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blood for point-of-care analysis of glucose levels is often obtained from different sources (fingerstick, arterial or central venous catheter).
OBJECTIVES: To examine agreement between point-of-care and laboratory glucose values and to determine effects of hematocrit, serum carbon dioxide, and mean arterial pressure on the accuracy of point-of-care values.
METHODS: Point-of-care values were compared with laboratory values. In 49 critically ill patients, blood was obtained first from a catheter for laboratory testing and then from the catheter and via fingerstick for point-of-care testing. Bias, precision, and root-mean-square differences were calculated to quantify differences in values between the 2 methods. A t test was used to determine differences in values between each point-of-care blood source and the laboratory value. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine if serum level of carbon dioxide, hematocrit, and/or mean arterial pressure significantly contributed to the difference in bias and precision for the point-of-care blood sources.
RESULTS: Mean laboratory glucose level was 135 (SEM 5.3, range 58-265) mg/dL. In point-of-care testing, bias +/- precision and root-mean-square differences were 2.1 +/- 12.3 and 12.35, respectively, for fingerstick blood and 0.6 +/- 10.6 and 10.46 for catheter blood. Values for point-of-care and laboratory tests did not differ significantly. For catheter samples, hematocrit and serum carbon dioxide contributed significantly to difference scores between point-of-care and laboratory values (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Glucose values for point-of-care samples did not differ significantly from laboratory values. For catheter samples, hematocrit and serum carbon dioxide levels accounted for the difference between point-of-care and laboratory glucose values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17595363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  16 in total

Review 1.  Accuracy of point-of-care glucose measurements.

Authors:  Annette Rebel; Mark A Rice; Brenda G Fahy
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-01

Review 2.  Design, analysis, and interpretation of method-comparison studies.

Authors:  Sandra K Hanneman
Journal:  AACN Adv Crit Care       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun

3.  The correlation of hemoglobin A1c to blood glucose.

Authors:  Ken Sikaris
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-01

4.  Intermediary variables and algorithm parameters for an electronic algorithm for intravenous insulin infusion.

Authors:  Susan S Braithwaite; Hemant Godara; Julie Song; Bruce A Cairns; Samuel W Jones; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

5.  Accuracy of point-of-care blood glucose measurements in critically ill patients in shock.

Authors:  Carlo Jan Pati-An Garingarao; Myrna Buenaluz-Sedurante; Cecilia Alegado Jimeno
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-08

Review 6.  Perioperative blood glucose monitoring in the general surgical population.

Authors:  Tejal A Raju; Marc C Torjman; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-11-01

7.  Intensive insulin therapy improves insulin sensitivity and mitochondrial function in severely burned children.

Authors:  Ricki Y Fram; Melanie G Cree; Robert R Wolfe; Ronald P Mlcak; Ting Qian; David L Chinkes; David N Herndon
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Dynamic electrochemistry corrects for hematocrit interference on blood glucose determinations with patient self-measurement devices.

Authors:  Petra B Musholt; Christina Schipper; Nicole Thomé; Sanja Ramljak; Marc Schmidt; Thomas Forst; Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-01

9.  Evaluation of the VIA Blood Chemistry Monitor for Glucose in Healthy and Diabetic Volunteers.

Authors:  Arjunan Ganesh; Brian Hipszer; Navdeep Loomba; Barbara Simon; Marc C Torjman; Jeffrey Joseph
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-03

10.  A Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of Collecting and Transmitting Clinical Trial Data with Mobile Technologies.

Authors:  Colleen Russell; Nadir Ammour; Toby Wells; Nicolas Bonnet; Matthias Kruse; Agnes Tardat; Christel Erales; Thomas Shook; Stephane Kirkesseli; Lionel Hovsepian; Sy Pretorius
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2018-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.