Literature DB >> 19885341

Evaluation of the VIA Blood Chemistry Monitor for Glucose in Healthy and Diabetic Volunteers.

Arjunan Ganesh1, Brian Hipszer, Navdeep Loomba, Barbara Simon, Marc C Torjman, Jeffrey Joseph.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Manual methods of blood glucose monitoring are labor-intensive, costly, prone to error, and expose the caregiver to blood. The VIA(R) blood chemistry monitor for glucose can automatically measure plasma glucose (PG) every 5 minutes for 72 hours using blood sampled from a peripheral vein/artery or a central vein.
METHODS: VIA performance was evaluated in eight normal and five type 1 diabetic (T1DM) subjects in 15 separate experiments. The VIA device was connected to a peripheral vein and reported a PG value every 5 minutes during each 510-minute experiment. Blood samples were collected manually every 10 minutes and assayed using a HemoCue(R) beta-glucose analyzer (HC). Whole blood HC measurements were corrected to PG values. Paired HC/VIA measurements (n = 717) were analyzed.
RESULTS: Mean PG was 90 +/- 14 and 96 +/- 12 mg/dl in normal subjects and 194 +/- 64 and 173 +/- 48 mg/dl in T1DM subject as measured by the HC and VIA, respectively. Clark error grid analysis revealed 86% points in zone A, 11% points in zone B, and 2% points in zone D. Linear regression analysis yielded the following equation: VIA = 0.732 x HC + 30.5 (r(2) = 0.954). Residual analysis revealed a glucose-dependent bias between the HC and the VIA. VIA data were transformed using the linear regression equation to correct for bias. After the correction, the mean absolute relative difference between the VIA and the HC was less than 10%, and 99.6% of data were in zones A and B. The VIA was able to sample blood automatically every 5 minutes for more than 8 hours in the laboratory setting. On average, the VIA reported glucose values for 94% of the samples it attempted to obtain.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the VIA blood chemistry monitor for glucose can reliably sample blood frequently for a prolonged period of time safely and effectively in diabetic and nondiabetic volunteers. Agreement between the two devices was the closest at normal glucose concentrations. After correcting for a glucose-dependent bias between the devices, the MARD was consistently less than 10% for all glucose ranges.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CGM; V-GLU1 glucose sensor; VIA blood chemistry monitor for glucose; VIA glucose monitoring system; continuous glucose monitoring system; glucose sensor

Year:  2008        PMID: 19885341      PMCID: PMC2771480          DOI: 10.1177/193229680800200203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  78 in total

1.  Relationships of glucose concentrations in capillary whole blood, venous whole blood and venous plasma.

Authors:  K Kuwa; T Nakayama; T Hoshino; M Tominaga
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.786

2.  The reliability of blood sampling from peripheral intravenous infusion lines. Complete blood cell counts, electrolyte panels, and survey panels.

Authors:  M Mohler; Y Sato; K Bobick; L C Wise
Journal:  J Intraven Nurs       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

3.  Proposal for standardizing direct-reading biosensors for blood glucose.

Authors:  N Fogh-Andersen; P D'Orazio
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Measurement error and correlation coefficients.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-06

Review 5.  Laboratory sampling. Does the process affect the outcome?

Authors:  K Becan-McBride
Journal:  J Intraven Nurs       Date:  1999 May-Jun

6.  Significant increase of activated partial thromboplastin time by heparinization of the radial artery catheter flush solution with a closed arterial catheter system.

Authors:  Eric A J Hoste; Nathalie R A Roels; Johan M A Decruyenaere; Francis A Colardyn
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Persistent hyperglycemia is predictive of outcome in critically ill trauma patients.

Authors:  Grant V Bochicchio; Jin Sung; Manjari Joshi; Kelly Bochicchio; Steven B Johnson; Walter Meyer; Thomas M Scalea
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-05

8.  Poor intraoperative blood glucose control is associated with a worsened hospital outcome after cardiac surgery in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Alexandre Ouattara; Patrick Lecomte; Yannick Le Manach; Marc Landi; Sophie Jacqueminet; Igor Platonov; Nicolas Bonnet; Bruno Riou; Pierre Coriat
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Multicenter study of oxygen-insensitive handheld glucose point-of-care testing in critical care/hospital/ambulatory patients in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  G J Kost; H T Vu; J H Lee; P Bourgeois; F L Kiechle; C Martin; S S Miller; A O Okorodudu; J J Podczasy; R Webster; K J Whitlow
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Pilot study of the accuracy of bedside glucometry in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  J G Ray; C Hamielec; T Mastracci
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  9 in total

1.  An analysis: hyperglycemic intensive care patients need continuous glucose monitoring-easier said than done.

Authors:  Brenda G Fahy; Douglas B Coursin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-03

2.  Pilot evaluation of a prototype critical care blood glucose monitor in normal volunteers.

Authors:  Marc C Torjman; Michael E Goldberg; Jeffrey J Littman; Robert A Hirsh; Richard P Dellinger
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-11-01

Review 3.  Why Have So Many Intravascular Glucose Monitoring Devices Failed?

Authors:  John L Smith; Mark J Rice
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-07

4.  Multicenter Observational Study of the First-Generation Intravenous Blood Glucose Monitoring System in Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Grant V Bochicchio; Brian R Hipszer; Michelle F Magee; Richard M Bergenstal; Anthony P Furnary; Angela M Gulino; Michael J Higgins; Peter C Simpson; Jeffrey I Joseph
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 5.  Clinical need for continuous glucose monitoring in the hospital.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Joseph; Brian Hipszer; Boris Mraovic; Inna Chervoneva; Mark Joseph; Zvi Grunwald
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-11-01

6.  Glucose Management Technologies for the Critically Ill.

Authors:  Pedro D Salinas; Carlos E Mendez
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-13

Review 7.  Vascular Glucose Sensor Symposium: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems (CGMS) for Hospitalized and Ambulatory Patients at Risk for Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, and Glycemic Variability.

Authors:  Jeffrey I Joseph; Marc C Torjman; Paul J Strasma
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-15

8.  An automated discontinuous venous blood sampling system for ex vivo glucose determination in humans.

Authors:  Roland Schaller; Franz Feichtner; Hans Köhler; Manfred Bodenlenz; Johannes Plank; Andrea Wutte; Julia K Mader; Martin Ellmerer; Reinhard Hainisch; Thomas R Pieber; Lukas Schaupp
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-01

Review 9.  Managing hyperglycemia during the COVID-19 pandemic: Improving outcomes using new technologies in intensive care.

Authors:  Timothy Valk; Carol McMorrow
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-11-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.