Literature DB >> 17595009

Aberrant DNA methylation in porcine in vitro-, parthenogenetic-, and somatic cell nuclear transfer-produced blastocysts.

Aaron J Bonk1, Rongfeng Li, Liangxue Lai, Yanhong Hao, Zhonghua Liu, Melissa Samuel, Emily A Fergason, Kristin M Whitworth, Clifton N Murphy, Eric Antoniou, Randall S Prather.   

Abstract

Early embryonic development in the pig requires DNA methylation remodeling of the maternal and paternal genomes. Aberrant remodeling, which can be exasperated by in vitro technologies, is detrimental to development and can result in physiological and anatomic abnormalities in the developing fetus and offspring. Here, we developed and validated a microarray based approach to characterize on a global scale the CpG methylation profiles of porcine gametes and blastocyst stage embryos. The relative methylation in the gamete and blastocyst samples showed that 18.5% (921/4,992) of the DNA clones were found to be significantly different (P < 0.01) in at least one of the samples. Furthermore, for the different blastocyst groups, the methylation profile of the in vitro-produced blastocysts was less similar to the in vivo-produced blastocysts as compared to the parthenogenetic- and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT)-produced blastocysts. The microarray results were validated by using bisulfite sequencing for 12 of the genomic regions in liver, sperm, and in vivo-produced blastocysts. These results suggest that a generalized change in global methylation is not responsible for the low developmental potential of blastocysts produced by using in vitro techniques. Instead, the appropriate methylation of a relatively small number of genomic regions in the early embryo may enable early development to occur. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17595009      PMCID: PMC2488202          DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  30 in total

1.  Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome.

Authors:  W Mayer; A Niveleau; J Walter; R Fundele; T Haaf
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals.

Authors:  Hugh D Morgan; Fátima Santos; Kelly Green; Wendy Dean; Wolf Reik
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Global gene expression profiles reveal significant nuclear reprogramming by the blastocyst stage after cloning.

Authors:  Sadie L Smith; Robin E Everts; X Cindy Tian; Fuliang Du; Li-Ying Sung; Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas; Byeong-Seon Jeong; Jean-Paul Renard; Harris A Lewin; Xiangzhong Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The capability of reprogramming the male chromatin after fertilization is dependent on the quality of oocyte maturation.

Authors:  Luisa Gioia; Barbara Barboni; Maura Turriani; Giulia Capacchietti; Maria Gabriella Pistilli; Paolo Berardinelli; Mauro Mattioli
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Activation of ribosomal RNA genes in porcine embryos produced in vitro or by somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Bolette Bjerregaard; Hanne G Pedersen; Anne S Jakobsen; Lee F Rickords; Liangxue Lai; Hee-Tae Cheong; Melissa Samuel; Randall S Prather; Frantisek Strejcek; Zaida R Rasmussen; Jozef Laurincik; Heiner Niemann; Poul Maddox-Hyttel; Preben D Thomsen
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.609

6.  Expression levels of growth-regulating imprinted genes in cloned piglets.

Authors:  Le Jiang; Pete Jobst; Liangxue Lai; Melissa Samuel; David Ayares; Randall S Prather; X Cindy Tian
Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells       Date:  2007

7.  Chromosome methylation patterns during mammalian preimplantation development.

Authors:  N Rougier; D Bourc'his; D M Gomes; A Niveleau; M Plachot; A Pàldi; E Viegas-Péquignot
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Development of early porcine embryos in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Z Macháty; B N Day; R S Prather
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  Methylation profiling of CpG islands in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  T H Huang; M R Perry; D E Laux
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Spatial separation of parental genomes in preimplantation mouse embryos.

Authors:  W Mayer; A Smith; R Fundele; T Haaf
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2000-02-21       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Transcriptional, post-transcriptional and epigenetic control of porcine oocyte maturation and embryogenesis.

Authors:  R S Prather; J W Ross; S Clay Isom; J A Green
Journal:  Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl       Date:  2009

2.  Epigenetic disruptions of histone signatures for the trophectoderm and inner cell mass in mouse parthenogenetic embryos.

Authors:  Yi-Hui Chen; John Yu
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 3.  Applications of omics and nanotechnology to improve pig embryo production in vitro.

Authors:  Caroline G Lucas; Paula R Chen; Fabiana K Seixas; Randall S Prather; Tiago Collares
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.609

4.  Somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency: how can it be improved through nuclear remodeling and reprogramming?

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.609

5.  Comparison of gene expression and genome-wide DNA methylation profiling between phenotypically normal cloned pigs and conventionally bred controls.

Authors:  Fei Gao; Yonglun Luo; Shengting Li; Jian Li; Lin Lin; Anders Lade Nielsen; Charlotte Brandt Sørensen; Gábor Vajta; Jun Wang; Xiuqing Zhang; Yutao Du; Huanming Yang; Lars Bolund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Analysis of apoptosis and methyltransferase mRNA expression in porcine cloned embryos cultured in vitro.

Authors:  Shiqiang Ju; Rong Rui; Qing Lu; Pengfei Lin; Huili Guo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Epigenetic modification of fetal fibroblasts improves developmental competency and gene expression in porcine cloned embryos.

Authors:  B Mohana Kumar; Geun-Ho Maeng; Yeon-Mi Lee; Jeong-Hyeon Lee; Byeong-Gyun Jeon; Sun-A Ock; Taeyoung Kang; Gyu-Jin Rho
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 2.459

8.  Transcriptome Analysis of Pig In Vivo, In Vitro-Fertilized, and Nuclear Transfer Blastocyst-Stage Embryos Treated with Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Postfusion and Activation Reveals Changes in the Lysosomal Pathway.

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Jiude Mao; Kiho Lee; William G Spollen; Melissa S Samuel; Eric M Walters; Lee D Spate; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.987

9.  Correlation of developmental differences of nuclear transfer embryos cells to the methylation profiles of nuclear transfer donor cells in Swine.

Authors:  Aaron J Bonk; Hee-Tae Cheong; Rongfeng Li; Liangxue Lai; Yanhong Hao; Zhonghua Liu; Melissa Samuel; Emily A Fergason; Kristin M Whitworth; Clifton N Murphy; Eric Antoniou; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 10.  Cloned transgenic heart-healthy pork?

Authors:  Randall S Prather
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.145

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.