Literature DB >> 17594084

The safety and efficacy of the Angio-Seal closure device in diagnostic and interventional neuroangiography setting: a single-center experience with 1,443 closures.

Serdar Geyik1, Kivilcim Yavuz, Ayca Akgoz, Osman Koc, Bora Peynircioglu, Barbaros Cil, Saruhan Cekirge, Isil Saatci.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the Angio-Seal closure device used to close arterial puncture sites in patients who had undergone diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures.
METHODS: A total of 1,443 Angio-Seal devices were placed in 1,099 patients in the Interventional Neuroradiology Unit between May 2005 and August 2006. Of these, 670 were interventional and 745 were diagnostic cerebral angiographic procedures. In 28 patients bilateral puncture of the femoral arteries was performed for endovascular treatment. In 167 patients 286 repeat diagnostic procedures were performed and 30 interventional procedures were followed by re-closure with an Angio-Seal device at the time of repeat puncture.
RESULTS: The procedural success rate for antegrade closures was 99.7% for all procedures. The device failed in 5 of 745 diagnostic procedures (0.7%). Major complication occurred in one patient only (0.13%) in the diagnostic group. No minor complications were observed in this group. In the interventional group, the major complication rate was 1.4% (10 of 698 closures) and the minor complication rate was 2.4% (17 of 698 closures). However, in the subgroup of patients with cerebral aneurysms who received heparin in combination with antiplatelet agents after the procedure, the major complication rate was 5.3%, but in the carotid/vertebral stenting group it was 0.8%.
CONCLUSION: Our experience in a relatively large series of patients shows that the use of the Angio-Seal STS vascular closure device is safe and effective in patients undergoing cerebral diagnostic angiography and neurointerventional procedures with an acceptable rate of complications, although the complication rate was higher in the group of patients who received heparin and/or antiplatelet medication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17594084     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-007-0249-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  26 in total

Review 1.  Prevention and treatment of thromboembolic and ischemic complications associated with endovascular procedures: Part II--Clinical aspects and recommendations.

Authors:  A I Qureshi; A R Luft; M Sharma; L R Guterman; L N Hopkins
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 2.  Percutaneous arterial closure devices.

Authors:  Eric K Hoffer; Robert D Bloch
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 3.  Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eugenia Nikolsky; Roxana Mehran; Amir Halkin; Eve D Aymong; Gary S Mintz; Zoran Lasic; Manuela Negoita; Martin Fahy; Shoshana Krieger; Issam Moussa; Jeffrey W Moses; Gregg W Stone; Martin B Leon; Stuart J Pocock; George Dangas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-06-12       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Neurointerventional experience with an arteriotomy suture device.

Authors:  P P Morris; G Braden
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Complications of transluminal angioplasty.

Authors:  G A Gardiner; M F Meyerovitz; K R Stokes; M E Clouse; D P Harrington; M A Bettmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Transfemoral catheterization: mechanical versus manual control of bleeding.

Authors:  H J Semler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Heparin after percutaneous intervention (HAPI): a prospective multicenter randomized trial of three heparin regimens after successful coronary intervention.

Authors:  M Rabah; D Mason; D W Muller; R Hundley; A D Kugelmass; B Weiner; L Cannon; W W O'Neill; R D Safian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  An evaluation of immediate sheath removal and use of the Angio-Seal vascular closure device in neuroradiological interventions.

Authors:  L Pierot; D Herbreteau; S Bracard; J Berge; C Cognard
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Femoral artery catheterization complications: a study of 503 consecutive patients.

Authors:  D B Bogart; M A Bogart; J T Miller; M W Farrar; W K Barr; M A Montgomery
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1995-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  Safety and feasibility of a novel vascular closure device in neurointerventional procedures.

Authors:  Ammar Taha; Ellen K Walsh; Kathryn A Wright; Iftikhar Ahmed; Nucharin Supakul; Eric E Awwad; Juan G Tejada
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Haemostasis with the FISH Vascular Closure Device after 6 French Transfemoral Accesses in Interventional Radiology: Clinical Results.

Authors:  Peter C Kamusella; Christopher W Lüdtke; Fabian Scheer; Reimer Andresen; Christian Wissgott
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

3.  Delayed Vascular Claudication Following Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography: A Rare Complication of the AngioSeal Arteriotomy Closure Device.

Authors:  Jacquelyn A Corley; Manish K Kasliwal; Lee A Tan; Demetrius K Lopes
Journal:  J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg       Date:  2014-09-30

4.  Delayed complication from a percutaneous vascular closure device following a neuro-interventional procedure.

Authors:  Ahmed Khaldi; B Waldau; C Skowlund; G J Velat; J Mocco; B L Hoh
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Carotid Access and Puncture Closure with Angio-Seal in Horses.

Authors:  Arantza Vitoria; Alicia Laborda; Carolina Serrano-Casorrán; Sara Fuente; Antonio Romero; Francisco José Vázquez
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Prospective comparison of angio-seal versus manual compression for hemostasis after neurointerventional procedures under systemic heparinization.

Authors:  H-F Wong; C-W Lee; Y-L Chen; Y-M Wu; H-H Weng; Y-H Wang; H-M Liu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Safety and efficacy of Angio-Seal device for transfemoral neuroendovascular procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Muhammed Amir Essibayi; Harry Cloft; Luis E Savastano; Waleed Brinjikji
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 1.764

8.  Percutaneous Vascular Closure System Based on an Extravascular, Bioabsorbable Polyglycolic Plug (ExoSeal): Results from 1000 Patients.

Authors:  P Kamusella; C Wissgott; T Jahnke; J Brossmann; F Scheer; C W Lüdtke; R Andresen
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-10

9.  A nomogram for predicting the risk of femoral pseudoaneurysm after neurointerventional procedures.

Authors:  Liangliang Yang; Puyuan Zhao; Bin Liu; Yang Gao; Hao Zhou; Qiuping Li; Yingchuan Jiang; Zhigang Yang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.