Literature DB >> 22192557

Delayed complication from a percutaneous vascular closure device following a neuro-interventional procedure.

Ahmed Khaldi1, B Waldau, C Skowlund, G J Velat, J Mocco, B L Hoh.   

Abstract

Percutaneous vascular closure devices are being increasingly used as alternatives to manual compression for the closure of femoral arteriotomy after endovascular procedures as they appear to reduce time to ambulate, improve patient's comfort, and are implicated with cost saving. However, vascular closure devices have been associated with an increased risk of complications including hematoma formation, local bleeding, arteriovenous fistula formation, pseudoaneurysm and arterial leg ischemia. To our knowledge, if the above complications occur it is usually within the first 30 days after the procedure. None have been reported in a delayed fashion ten months or longer after closure. We describe a 30-year-old man with a history of a giant basilar trunk aneurysm. He was placed on aspirin and clopidogrel prior to the procedure. He had bilateral femoral access with 6 French sheaths. Following the procedure, 6 French Angio-Seals (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA) were used for closure of bilateral femoral arteriotomies. Ten months after the procedure, the patient kicked a metal cart and developed a large right retroperitoneal iliopsoas hematoma. There was no evidence of pseudoaneurysm. The patient was managed conservatively and his serial hematocrit stayed stable. He did not require surgical intervention. Use of percutaneous vascular closure devices is associated with complications including risk of hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, intravenous fistula, rectal peritoneal hemorrhage, limb ischemia and possible surgical repair. Most complications occur peri-procedure or within 30 days post-procedure. This is the first reported case of a delayed complication at ten months after the initial procedure. Site-related complications associated with percutaneous vascular closure devices may occur in a delayed fashion, even ten months post-procedure, so should be considered in the management of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22192557      PMCID: PMC3296513          DOI: 10.1177/159101991101700417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol        ISSN: 1591-0199            Impact factor:   1.610


  17 in total

Review 1.  Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eugenia Nikolsky; Roxana Mehran; Amir Halkin; Eve D Aymong; Gary S Mintz; Zoran Lasic; Manuela Negoita; Martin Fahy; Shoshana Krieger; Issam Moussa; Jeffrey W Moses; Gregg W Stone; Martin B Leon; Stuart J Pocock; George Dangas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Risk factors for the development of retroperitoneal hematoma after percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and vascular closure devices.

Authors:  H M Omar Farouque; Jennifer A Tremmel; Farshad Raissi Shabari; Meenakshi Aggarwal; William F Fearon; Martin K C Ng; Mehrdad Rezaee; Alan C Yeung; David P Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Spontaneous rupture of the right external iliac vein.

Authors:  Hong Zang; Ting Zhang; Ai-Lian Liu; Feng Wang; Hong Shi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 1.466

4.  A randomized trial of vascular hemostasis techniques to reduce femoral vascular complications after coronary intervention.

Authors:  J B Pracyk; T C Wall; J P Longabaugh; F D Tice; J Hochrein; C Green; G Cox; K Lee; R S Stack; J E Tcheng
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Retroperitoneal hematoma after cardiac catheterization: prevalence, risk factors, and optimal management.

Authors:  K C Kent; M Moscucci; K A Mansour; S DiMattia; S Gallagher; R Kuntz; J J Skillman
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  A cost-minimization analysis of the angio-seal vascular closure device following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Frederic S Resnic; Nipun Arora; Michael Matheny; Matthew R Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  An evaluation of immediate sheath removal and use of the Angio-Seal vascular closure device in neuroradiological interventions.

Authors:  L Pierot; D Herbreteau; S Bracard; J Berge; C Cognard
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Spontaneous Iliac vein rupture: case report and comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Henry Tannous; Fady Nasrallah; Massoud Marjani
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 1.466

9.  Correlates and outcomes of retroperitoneal hemorrhage complicating percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Stephen G Ellis; Deepak Bhatt; Samir Kapadia; David Lee; Michael Yen; Patrick L Whitlow
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Complications of a percutaneous suture-mediated closure device versus manual compression for arteriotomy closure: a case-controlled study.

Authors:  Steven C Wagner; Carin F Gonsalves; David J Eschelman; Kevin L Sullivan; Joseph Bonn
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.464

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Angioseal and Manual Compression in Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Interventional Procedures.

Authors:  Abdullah M Alshehri; Mohamed Elsharawy
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-06

2.  Angio-Seal Vascular Closure Related Acute Limb Ischemia: A Case Report.

Authors:  Maya Srinivasan; Pramod Theetha Kariyanna; Jeremy Smith; Sushruth Das; Amog Jayarangaiah; Sudhanva Hegde; Jessica L Perez Perez; Isabel M McFarlane
Journal:  Am J Med Case Rep       Date:  2019-12-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.