Literature DB >> 17590355

Functional MRI with active, fully implanted, deep brain stimulation systems: safety and experimental confounds.

David W Carmichael1, Serge Pinto, Patricia Limousin-Dowsey, Stephane Thobois, Philip J Allen, Louis Lemieux, Tarek Yousry, John S Thornton.   

Abstract

We investigated safety issues and potential experimental confounds when performing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) investigations in human subjects with fully implanted, active, deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems. Measurements of temperature and induced voltage were performed in an in vitro arrangement simulating bilateral DBS during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using head transmit coils in both 1.5 and 3.0 T MRI systems. For MRI sequences typical of an fMRI study with coil-averaged specific absorption rates (SARs) less than 0.4 W/kg, no MRI-induced temperature change greater than the measurement sensitivity (0.1 degrees C) was detected at 1.5 T, and at 3 T temperature elevations were less than 0.5 degrees C, i.e. within safe limits. For the purposes of demonstration, MRI pulse sequences with SARs of 1.45 W/kg and 2.34 W/kg (at 1.5 T and 3 T, respectively) were prescribed and elicited temperature increases (>1 degrees C) greater than those considered safe for human subjects. Temperature increases were independent of the presence or absence of active stimulator pulsing. At both field strengths during echo planar MRI, the perturbations of DBS equipment performance were sufficiently slight, and temperature increases sufficiently low to suggest that thermal or electromagnetically mediated experimental confounds to fMRI with DBS are unlikely. We conclude that fMRI studies performed in subjects with subcutaneously implanted DBS units can be both safe and free from DBS-specific experimental confounds. Furthermore, fMRI in subjects with fully implanted rather than externalized DBS stimulator units may offer a significant safety advantage. Further studies are required to determine the safety of MRI with DBS for other MRI systems, transmit coil configurations and DBS arrangements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17590355     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  39 in total

Review 1.  Network effects of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ahmad Alhourani; Michael M McDowell; Michael J Randazzo; Thomas A Wozny; Efstathios D Kondylis; Witold J Lipski; Sarah Beck; Jordan F Karp; Avniel S Ghuman; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Assessing the Electromagnetic Fields Generated By a Radiofrequency MRI Body Coil at 64 MHz: Defeaturing Versus Accuracy.

Authors:  Elena Lucano; Micaela Liberti; Gonzalo G Mendoza; Tom Lloyd; Maria Ida Iacono; Francesca Apollonio; Steve Wedan; Wolfgang Kainz; Leonardo M Angelone
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Centromedian-parafascicular deep brain stimulation induces differential functional inhibition of the motor, associative, and limbic circuits in large animals.

Authors:  Joo Pyung Kim; Hoon-Ki Min; Emily J Knight; Penelope S Duffy; Osama A Abulseoud; Michael P Marsh; Katherine Kelsey; Charles D Blaha; Kevin E Bennet; Mark A Frye; Kendall H Lee
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 13.382

4.  It's the little things: On the complexity of planar electrode heating in MRI.

Authors:  Johannes B Erhardt; Thomas Lottner; Jessica Martinez; Ali C Özen; Martin Schuettler; Thomas Stieglitz; Daniel B Ennis; Michael Bock
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Neural circuit modulation during deep brain stimulation at the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease: what have we learned from neuroimaging studies?

Authors:  Daniel L Albaugh; Yen-Yu Ian Shih
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2013-12-18

Review 6.  Endogenous brain oscillations and related networks detected by surface EEG-combined fMRI.

Authors:  Helmut Laufs
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Motor and Nonmotor Circuitry Activation Induced by Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Parkinson Disease: Intraoperative Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Emily J Knight; Paola Testini; Hoon-Ki Min; William S Gibson; Krzysztof R Gorny; Christopher P Favazza; Joel P Felmlee; Inyong Kim; Kirk M Welker; Daniel A Clayton; Bryan T Klassen; Su-youne Chang; Kendall H Lee
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Quantitatively validating the efficacy of artifact suppression techniques to study the cortical consequences of deep brain stimulation with magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Matthew J Boring; Zachary F Jessen; Thomas A Wozny; Michael J Ward; Ashley C Whiteman; R Mark Richardson; Avniel Singh Ghuman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Measurements of RF heating during 3.0-T MRI of a pig implanted with deep brain stimulator.

Authors:  Krzysztof R Gorny; Michael F Presti; Stephan J Goerss; Sun C Hwang; Dong-Pyo Jang; Inyong Kim; Hoon-Ki Min; Yunhong Shu; Christopher P Favazza; Kendall H Lee; Matt A Bernstein
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: radiofrequency-induced heating.

Authors:  David W Carmichael; John S Thornton; Roman Rodionov; Rachel Thornton; Andrew McEvoy; Philip J Allen; Louis Lemieux
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.