Literature DB >> 17589828

Functional improvement after unicompartmental knee replacement: a follow-up study with a performance based knee test.

Lucas L A Kleijn1, Wouter L W van Hemert, Will G H Meijers, Arnold D M Kester, Lukas Lisowski, Bernd Grimm, Ide C Heyligers.   

Abstract

In literature no reports appear on functional recovery of unicompartmental knee replacement using both subjective and objective methods. Functional aspects are especially of importance, since prosthetic replacement is considered more often in younger patients, who require an optimal knee function for activities such as sports. In a prospective study on 38 patients with a mean age of 62.2 years functional improvement was measured. Using Knee Society Score (KSS) as a clinician based score and the Dynaport Knee Test as a functional test measurements were performed at preoperative, 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years, after surgery. The Dynaport Knee Test is an accelerometer-based system that objectively measures functional aspects of gait during various tasks of daily life. It consists of four sub scores. The KSS assesses pain and function. Both scores range from 0 to 100. The mean KSS preoperative was 44.0 and improved significantly to 81.7 at 3 months (P<0.001) and to 87.4 (P=0.025) at 6 months. No significant differences were noted after 6 months. The mean preoperative Dynaport Knee Test score was 35.8 and at 3 months 43.6 (P<0.001), 48.6 at 6 months (P<0.001). No significant differences were noted after 6 months follow-up. Of the Dynaport sub scores, the low demanding tasks Lift and Move and Locomotion, cease to improve beyond 6 months. The high demanding task Transfers only improved up to 3 months. However, the other high demanding tasks Rise and Descend showed improvement beyond 1 year after surgery, since the improvement from 6 months to 2 years was significant (P=0.023). This study has found that functional recovery continues beyond 6 months and even up to 2 years. It seems only more challenging tests can discriminate on improvement beyond a point where questionnaires cease to improve. The use of objective measurement methods is advocated next to the clinician based scores and self reported questionnaires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17589828     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-007-0351-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  25 in total

1.  A correlation study of objective functionality and WOMAC in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  E Witvrouw; J Victor; J Bellemans; B Rock; R Van Lummel; R Van Der Slikke; R Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Analysis of first forty Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement from a small district hospital in UK.

Authors:  Graham W Keys; Zain Ul-Abiddin; Eugene M Toh
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis.

Authors:  J H Newman; C E Ackroyd; N A Shah
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-09

4.  Knee scoring systems in gonarthrosis. Evaluation of interobserver variability and the envelope of bias. Score Assessment Group.

Authors:  L Ryd; J Kärrholm; P Ahlvin
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1997-02

5.  Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses.

Authors:  O Robertsson; L Borgquist; K Knutson; S Lewold; L Lidgren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-04

6.  Reproducibility and validity of the DynaPort KneeTest.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Rienk M A van der Slikke; Rob C van Lummel; Rob J Benink; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-06-15

7.  Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty?: Results from a matched study.

Authors:  Anish K Amin; James T Patton; Robert E Cook; Mark Gaston; Ivan J Brenkel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Quantitative gait analysis after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Joanne E Wittwer; Julian A Feller
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Improvement in gait one year after surgery for knee osteoarthrosis: a comparison between high tibial osteotomy and prosthetic replacement in a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  L Weidenhielm; E Olsson; L A Broström; M Börjesson-Hederström; E Mattsson
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1993-03

10.  Measuring functional abilities of patients with knee problems: rationale and construction of the DynaPort knee test.

Authors:  N van den Dikkenberg; O G Meijer; R M A van der Slikke; R C van Lummel; J H van Dieën; B Pijls; R J Benink; P I J M Wuisman
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  11 in total

1.  Early functional outcome after subvastus or parapatellar approach in knee arthroplasty is comparable.

Authors:  Gayle D Maffulli; Stephen Bridgman; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Muscle activity around the knee and gait performance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty patients: a comparative study on fixed- and mobile-bearing designs.

Authors:  Fabio Catani; Maria Grazia Benedetti; Luca Bianchi; Valentina Marchionni; Sandro Giannini; Alberto Leardini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  High correlation of the Oxford Knee Score with postoperative pain, but not with performance-based functioning.

Authors:  Ruud P van Hove; Richard M Brohet; Barend J van Royen; Peter A Nolte
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Gait analysis of patients with an off-the-shelf total knee replacement versus customized bi-compartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  Henry Wang; Jonathan Foster; Natasha Franksen; Jill Estes; Lindsey Rolston
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Does interlimb knee symmetry exist after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Yang-Chieh Fu; Kathy J Simpson; Tracy L Kinsey; Ormonde M Mahoney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  No Differences in Outcomes Scores or Survivorship of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Between Patients Younger or Older than 55 Years of Age at Minimum 10-Year Followup.

Authors:  Merrill Lee; Jerry Chen; Chia Shi Lu; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review of literature.

Authors:  Bernardino Saccomanni
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Time-dependent improvement in functional outcome following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A prospective longitudinal multicenter study involving 96 patients.

Authors:  Tor Kjetil Nerhus; Stig Heir; Ida Svege; Inge Skråmm; Tore Jervidalo; Jan Erik Madsen; Arne Ekeland
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Early functional outcome after subvastus or parapatellar approach in knee arthroplasty is comparable.

Authors:  Wouter L W van Hemert; Rachel Senden; Bernd Grimm; Matthijs J A van der Linde; Arno Lataster; Ide C Heyligers
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Deficits in functional performance and gait one year after total knee arthroplasty despite improved self-reported function.

Authors:  Josefine E Naili; Maura D Iversen; Anna-Clara Esbjörnsson; Margareta Hedström; Michael H Schwartz; Charlotte K Häger; Eva W Broström
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.