Literature DB >> 12211185

Measuring functional abilities of patients with knee problems: rationale and construction of the DynaPort knee test.

N van den Dikkenberg1, O G Meijer, R M A van der Slikke, R C van Lummel, J H van Dieën, B Pijls, R J Benink, P I J M Wuisman.   

Abstract

We present the rationale and design of the DynaPort knee test. The test aims at measuring knee patients' functional abilities in an unobtrusive, user-friendly way. Test persons wear several belts around their trunk and legs. The belts contain accelerometers, the signals of which are stored in a recorder, embedded in one of the belts. The knee test consists of a set of 29 tasks related to activities of daily life ("test items"). Accelerometer signals are analyzed in terms of 30 "movement features" (accelerations, angles, durations, frequencies, and some dimensionless numbers). In data analysis, the beginning and end of each test item is marked by hand; otherwise, analysis is automatic. We compared 140 knee patients with 32 healthy controls and found 541 of the 29 x 30=870 test item x movement feature combinations differed significantly between the two groups. From these 541 combinations the DynaPort knee score is calculated by the weighted averages of movement features per item, then weighted averages of items per cluster (locomotion, rising and descending, transfers, lifting and moving objects), and finally the average of the clusters. In an initial study the test-retest reliability of the knee test proved high, and the test turned out to be sufficiently responsive (0.7 patients' standard deviations improvement after 24 months). However, it remains difficult to interpret the scores in more meaningful terms than merely "better" or "worse." Extensive reliability studies in the future will further assess the validity of the test and provide more insight into the meaning of the scores. The DynaPort knee test may thus become an important instrument for evaluating patients'functional abilities in knee-related clinical practice and research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12211185     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-002-0279-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  8 in total

1.  Levels of analysis in knee surgery.

Authors:  Onno G Meijer; Nicolette van den Dikkenberg
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Functional improvement after unicompartmental knee replacement: a follow-up study with a performance based knee test.

Authors:  Lucas L A Kleijn; Wouter L W van Hemert; Will G H Meijers; Arnold D M Kester; Lukas Lisowski; Bernd Grimm; Ide C Heyligers
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  High correlation of the Oxford Knee Score with postoperative pain, but not with performance-based functioning.

Authors:  Ruud P van Hove; Richard M Brohet; Barend J van Royen; Peter A Nolte
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Assessing function in patients undergoing joint replacement: a study protocol for a cohort study.

Authors:  Vikki Wylde; Ashley W Blom; Stijn Bolink; Luke Brunton; Paul Dieppe; Rachael Gooberman-Hill; Bernd Grimm; Cindy Mann; Erik Lenguerrand
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Early functional outcome after subvastus or parapatellar approach in knee arthroplasty is comparable.

Authors:  Wouter L W van Hemert; Rachel Senden; Bernd Grimm; Matthijs J A van der Linde; Arno Lataster; Ide C Heyligers
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Knee disorders in primary care: design and patient selection of the HONEUR knee cohort.

Authors:  Edith M Heintjes; Marjolein Y Berger; Bart W Koes; Sita M Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-08-23       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Reliability of the 50-foot walk test and 30-sec chair stand test in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bayram Unver; Serpil Kalkan; Ertugrul Yuksel; Turhan Kahraman; Vasfi Karatosun
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.513

8.  Current clinical utilisation of wearable motion sensors for the assessment of outcome following knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.

Authors:  Scott R Small; Garrett S Bullock; Sara Khalid; Karen Barker; Marialena Trivella; Andrew James Price
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.