Henry Wang1, Jonathan Foster2, Natasha Franksen2, Jill Estes2, Lindsey Rolston3. 1. Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, 47306, USA. hwang2@bsu.edu. 2. Biomechanics Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, 47306, USA. 3. Henry County Center for Orthopedics, New Castle, IN, 47362, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Newer TKR designs have been introduced to the market with the aim of overcoming common sizing problems with older TKR designs. Furthermore, since a sizable percentage of patients with OA present with disease limited to the medial/lateral knee compartment in addition to the patellofemoral joint, for whom, a customized bi-compartmental knee replacement (BKR) is available as a treatment option. To date, there is very little information regarding knee strength and mechanics during gait for patients implanted with these modern TKR and BKR designs. The purpose of the study was to evaluate knee strength and mechanics during walking for patients with either a modern off the shelf TKR or a customized BKR and compare these findings to a cohort of healthy controls. METHODS: Twelve healthy controls, eight BKR, and nine TKR patients participated in the study. Maximal isometric knee strength was evaluated. 3D kinematic and kinetic analyses were conducted for level walking. RESULTS: The TKR knee exhibited less peak extensor torque when compared to, both the BKR and control limbs (p < 0.05). The TKR knee had less extensor moment at stance than both the BKR and control knees (p < 0.05). Both the BKR and control knees displayed larger internal rotation at stance than that of the TKR knee (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study suggests that, for patients that exhibit isolated OA of the tibiofemoral joint, using a customized BKR implant is a viable treatment option and may contribute to superior mechanical advantages.
INTRODUCTION: Newer TKR designs have been introduced to the market with the aim of overcoming common sizing problems with older TKR designs. Furthermore, since a sizable percentage of patients with OA present with disease limited to the medial/lateral knee compartment in addition to the patellofemoral joint, for whom, a customized bi-compartmental knee replacement (BKR) is available as a treatment option. To date, there is very little information regarding knee strength and mechanics during gait for patients implanted with these modern TKR and BKR designs. The purpose of the study was to evaluate knee strength and mechanics during walking for patients with either a modern off the shelf TKR or a customized BKR and compare these findings to a cohort of healthy controls. METHODS: Twelve healthy controls, eight BKR, and nine TKR patients participated in the study. Maximal isometric knee strength was evaluated. 3D kinematic and kinetic analyses were conducted for level walking. RESULTS: The TKR knee exhibited less peak extensor torque when compared to, both the BKR and control limbs (p < 0.05). The TKR knee had less extensor moment at stance than both the BKR and control knees (p < 0.05). Both the BKR and control knees displayed larger internal rotation at stance than that of the TKR knee (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study suggests that, for patients that exhibit isolated OA of the tibiofemoral joint, using a customized BKR implant is a viable treatment option and may contribute to superior mechanical advantages.
Authors: Lucas L A Kleijn; Wouter L W van Hemert; Will G H Meijers; Arnold D M Kester; Lukas Lisowski; Bernd Grimm; Ide C Heyligers Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2007-06-23 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: A A Bolanos; W A Colizza; P D McCann; R S Gotlin; M E Wootten; B A Kahn; J N Insall Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 1998-12 Impact factor: 4.757