Literature DB >> 17578724

Baseline correction of phase contrast images improves quantification of blood flow in the great vessels.

Alexander Chernobelsky1, Oleg Shubayev, Cindy R Comeau, Steven D Wolff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Phase-contrast Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CMR) generally requires the analysis of stationary tissue adjacent to a blood vessel to serve as a baseline reference for zero velocity. However, for the heart and great vessels, there is often no stationary tissue immediately adjacent to the vessel. Consequently, uncorrected velocity offsets may introduce substantial errors in flow quantification. The purpose of this study was to assess the magnitude of these flow errors and to validate a clinically applicable method for their correction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 10 normal volunteers, phase-contrast CMR was used to quantify blood flow in the main pulmonary artery (Qp) and the aorta (Qs). Following image acquisition, phase contrast CMR was performed on a stationary phantom using identical acquisition parameters so as to provide a baseline reference for zero velocity. Aortic and pulmonary blood flow was then corrected using the offset values from the phantom.
RESULTS: The mean difference between pulmonary and aortic flow was 26 +/- 21 mL before correction and 7.1 +/- 6.6 mL after correction (p = 0.002). The measured Qp/Qs was 1.25 +/- 0.20 before correction and 1.05 +/- 0.07 after correction (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Phase-contrast CMR can have substantial errors in great vessel flow quantification if there is no correction for velocity offset errors. The proposed method of correction is clinically applicable and provides a more accurate measurement of blood flow.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17578724     DOI: 10.1080/10976640601187588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson        ISSN: 1097-6647            Impact factor:   5.364


  53 in total

1.  Effect of protocol choice on phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance flow measurement in the ascending aorta: breath-hold and non-breath-hold.

Authors:  Michael A Bolen; Randolph M Setser; Ruvin S Gabriel; Rahul D Renapurkar; Yasmeen Tandon; Michael L Lieber; Milind Y Desai; Scott D Flamm
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Imaging congenital heart disease in adults.

Authors:  P J Kilner
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Cardiac index after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction measured with phase-contrast cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gert Klug; Sebastian Johannes Reinstadler; Hans-Josef Feistritzer; Christian Kremser; Johannes P Schwaiger; Martin Reindl; Johannes Mair; Silvana Müller; Agnes Mayr; Wolfgang-Michael Franz; Bernhard Metzler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Four-dimensional phase contrast MRI with accelerated dual velocity encoding.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Nett; Kevin M Johnson; Alex Frydrychowicz; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Eric Schrauben; Christopher J Francois; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Calculations of cardiovascular shunts and regurgitation using magnetic resonance ventricular volume and aortic and pulmonary flow measurements.

Authors:  Daniel G H Devos; Philip J Kilner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Improved accuracy in flow mapping of congenital heart disease using stationary phantom technique.

Authors:  Thomas A Miller; Andrew B Landes; Adrian M Moran
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 7.  Review of Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2009.

Authors:  D J Pennell; D N Firmin; P J Kilner; W J Manning; R H Mohiaddin; S Neubauer; S K Prasad
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 8.  Towards comprehensive assessment of mitral regurgitation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  K M John Chan; Ricardo Wage; Karen Symmonds; Shelley Rahman-Haley; Raad H Mohiaddin; David N Firmin; John R Pepper; Dudley J Pennell; Philip J Kilner
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 5.364

9.  Design and validation of Segment--freely available software for cardiovascular image analysis.

Authors:  Einar Heiberg; Jane Sjögren; Martin Ugander; Marcus Carlsson; Henrik Engblom; Håkan Arheden
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements.

Authors:  Peter D Gatehouse; Marijn P Rolf; Martin J Graves; Mark Bm Hofman; John Totman; Beat Werner; Rebecca A Quest; Yingmin Liu; Jochen von Spiczak; Matthias Dieringer; David N Firmin; Albert van Rossum; Massimo Lombardi; Juerg Schwitter; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Philip J Kilner
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.